Skip to content

Conversation

@itsyaasir
Copy link
Contributor

Issue ticket

Issue ticket link: <>

Checklist before requesting a review

Code conventions

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • Every new function is documented
  • Object names are auto explicative

Security

  • The PR does not break APIs backward compatibility
  • The PR does not break the stable storage backward compatibility

Testing

  • Every function is properly unit tested
  • I have added integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • IC endpoints are always tested through the canister_call! macro

@itsyaasir itsyaasir self-assigned this May 27, 2025
@itsyaasir itsyaasir requested review from ufoscout and veeso May 29, 2025 14:08
…; update EVM client to use UpgradeInfo directly
@itsyaasir itsyaasir requested review from ufoscout and veeso June 5, 2025 09:24
…o method to return last canister upgrade details
@itsyaasir itsyaasir requested a review from ufoscout June 10, 2025 04:11
@itsyaasir itsyaasir removed the request for review from veeso June 10, 2025 08:03
@ufoscout ufoscout merged commit 0287613 into main Jun 12, 2025
1 check passed
@ufoscout ufoscout deleted the feat/upgrade-info branch June 12, 2025 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants