to check failure #945
to check failure #945
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on modifying the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestRunner
participant GoTest
participant SubsetCommand
TestRunner->>GoTest: Run test_subset_with_session
GoTest->>SubsetCommand: Execute with input excluding "TestExample1"
SubsetCommand-->>GoTest: Return results
GoTest-->>TestRunner: Validate results
TestRunner->>GoTest: Run test_subset_without_session
GoTest->>SubsetCommand: Execute with input excluding "TestExample1"
SubsetCommand-->>GoTest: Return results
GoTest-->>TestRunner: Validate results
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)tests/test_runners/test_go_test.py (1)
The test input has been modified to exclude "TestExample1". Given the PR title "to check failure", please verify if this change is intentional and aligns with the expected test behavior. Let's check for any related test configurations or documentation: ✅ Verification successfulRemoving TestExample1 from test_subset_with_session is intentional and correct The removal of TestExample1 from
This separation allows testing both scenarios independently and the test data in both methods is correctly aligned with their respective test fixtures as shown in the test data files (reportv1.xml and reportv2.xml). 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation or configuration related to TestExample1
rg -g '!*.pyc' "TestExample1" --type yaml --type md
# Look for other test files that might be affected by this change
fd -e go -e py "test.*go.*test" -x rg -l "TestExample1" {}
Length of output: 149 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of test_go_test.py to understand the test context
cat tests/test_runners/test_go_test.py
# Also search for any test data or fixtures that might contain TestExample patterns
rg "TestExample[1-4]" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 10903 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
❌ Tests Failed✖️1 test failed ✔️169 tests passed 6/6 test sessions failed❌ Test session #3435732 failed ❌ Test session #3435728 failed ❌ Test session #3435725 failed ❌ Test session #3435724 failed ❌ Test session #3435722 failed ❌ Test session #3435721 failed |
❌ Tests Failed✖️1 test failed ✔️169 tests passed 3/6 test sessions failed❌ Test session #3435724 failed ❌ Test session #3435722 failed ❌ Test session #3435721 failed |
1 similar comment
❌ Tests Failed✖️1 test failed ✔️169 tests passed 3/6 test sessions failed❌ Test session #3435724 failed ❌ Test session #3435722 failed ❌ Test session #3435721 failed |
Summary by CodeRabbit
subsetcommand functionality.