-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.1k
PCX: AI Review of Basic Auth code example #27933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: production
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
This pull request requires reviews from CODEOWNERS as it changes files that match the following patterns:
|
|
Preview URL: https://15671f4d.preview.developers.cloudflare.com Files with changes (up to 15)
|
|
/bonk review this |
Co-authored-by: elithrar <elithrar@users.noreply.github.com>
Review SummaryThe PR makes three well-motivated changes to the Basic Auth code example. Here's my assessment: Changes1. Rust: Fix potential panics on malformed authorization headers (lines 298-317) Good fix. The old code accessed 2. Rust: Fix potential panic on credentials without a colon (lines 311-317) Good fix. The old code used 3. Hono: Consistency improvements (lines 351-383)
Minor observations (not blocking)
VerdictThe changes are correct, well-scoped, and improve both safety and consistency. No issues with the new code. |
|
/bonk fix the latent issues here. Rust code should be correct. |
Co-authored-by: elithrar <elithrar@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Here's a summary of the three fixes applied to the Rust code in 1.
|
Summary
PASSWORDbinding (hardcode username as"admin") for consistency with JS/TS/Rust examples/logoutroute to Hono example for consistency with other examples