Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

📄 36,860% (368.60x) speedup for UnoptimizedNeuralNet.forward in code_to_optimize/unoptimized_neural_net.py

⏱️ Runtime : 134 milliseconds 363 microseconds (best of 250 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a ~369x speedup (from 134ms to 363μs) by replacing inefficient nested Python loops with vectorized PyTorch operations that leverage highly optimized BLAS/LAPACK libraries and potential GPU acceleration.

Key Optimizations

1. Matrix Multiplication via F.linear()

  • Original: Triple-nested loops manually computing dot products element-by-element (lines consuming 75.8% + 7.2% = 83% of runtime)
  • Optimized: Single F.linear() calls that use optimized BLAS routines (GEMM operations)
  • Why faster: BLAS implementations use CPU vectorization (SIMD), cache-friendly memory access patterns, and multi-threading. A single batched matrix multiplication (batch_size, input_size) × (hidden_size, input_size)ᵀ replaces ~46,000 individual multiply-add operations scattered across Python loops.

2. ReLU Activation with .clamp()

  • Original: Nested loops with branching (if val > 0) for each element
  • Optimized: hidden.clamp(min=0.0) applies ReLU in a single vectorized operation
  • Why faster: Eliminates Python interpreter overhead, avoids branch misprediction penalties, and uses contiguous memory operations

3. Softmax via torch.softmax()

  • Original: Manual computation with loops for max finding, exp calculation, and normalization (consuming ~2.6% of runtime)
  • Optimized: torch.softmax(output, dim=1) uses numerically stable, vectorized implementation
  • Why faster: Single kernel call handles max-shifting, exponentials, and normalization in optimized C++ code with proper memory layout

4. Eliminated Redundant Overhead

  • Original: Creating temporary tensors like neuron_sum, temp_values, exp_values inside loops (~1.9% overhead)
  • Optimized: Direct in-place or single-allocation operations
  • Why faster: Reduces memory allocations, garbage collection pressure, and tensor indexing overhead

Performance Characteristics

The line profiler shows the original code spent 83% of time in innermost loop tensor arithmetic operations that required Python interpreter involvement for each element. The optimized version completes the entire forward pass in less time than the original spent on a single matrix multiplication loop iteration.

This optimization is particularly effective for:

  • Batch processing: Speedup scales with batch size as matrix operations amortize setup costs
  • Larger networks: Bigger hidden layers benefit more from optimized GEMM
  • GPU execution: PyTorch operations can leverage CUDA kernels (original loops cannot)
  • Production inference: Where the function is called repeatedly on similar-sized inputs

The transformation maintains identical mathematical semantics while leveraging PyTorch's optimized computational graph, making it suitable for any workload using this neural network forward pass.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 14 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 4 Passed
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_compiled_neural_net.py::test_compiled_neural_net 15.0ms 58.1μs 25716%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_deterministic_output 16.9ms 54.5μs 30904%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_range 8.47ms 27.9μs 30277%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_requires_grad_false 8.42ms 27.5μs 30519%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_shape 8.49ms 28.8μs 29381%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_softmax_normalization 8.42ms 28.2μs 29783%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_zeros_input 8.40ms 27.0μs 31015%✅
⏪ Click to see Replay Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_pytest_code_to_optimizetestspytesttest_compiled_neural_net_py__replay_test_0.py::test_code_to_optimize_unoptimized_neural_net_UnoptimizedNeuralNet_forward 60.1ms 111μs 53973%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-UnoptimizedNeuralNet.forward-mkqqsxba and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **~369x speedup** (from 134ms to 363μs) by replacing inefficient nested Python loops with vectorized PyTorch operations that leverage highly optimized BLAS/LAPACK libraries and potential GPU acceleration.

## Key Optimizations

**1. Matrix Multiplication via `F.linear()`**
- **Original**: Triple-nested loops manually computing dot products element-by-element (lines consuming 75.8% + 7.2% = 83% of runtime)
- **Optimized**: Single `F.linear()` calls that use optimized BLAS routines (GEMM operations)
- **Why faster**: BLAS implementations use CPU vectorization (SIMD), cache-friendly memory access patterns, and multi-threading. A single batched matrix multiplication `(batch_size, input_size) × (hidden_size, input_size)ᵀ` replaces ~46,000 individual multiply-add operations scattered across Python loops.

**2. ReLU Activation with `.clamp()`**
- **Original**: Nested loops with branching (`if val > 0`) for each element
- **Optimized**: `hidden.clamp(min=0.0)` applies ReLU in a single vectorized operation
- **Why faster**: Eliminates Python interpreter overhead, avoids branch misprediction penalties, and uses contiguous memory operations

**3. Softmax via `torch.softmax()`**
- **Original**: Manual computation with loops for max finding, exp calculation, and normalization (consuming ~2.6% of runtime)
- **Optimized**: `torch.softmax(output, dim=1)` uses numerically stable, vectorized implementation
- **Why faster**: Single kernel call handles max-shifting, exponentials, and normalization in optimized C++ code with proper memory layout

**4. Eliminated Redundant Overhead**
- **Original**: Creating temporary tensors like `neuron_sum`, `temp_values`, `exp_values` inside loops (~1.9% overhead)
- **Optimized**: Direct in-place or single-allocation operations
- **Why faster**: Reduces memory allocations, garbage collection pressure, and tensor indexing overhead

## Performance Characteristics

The line profiler shows the original code spent **83% of time** in innermost loop tensor arithmetic operations that required Python interpreter involvement for each element. The optimized version completes the entire forward pass in less time than the original spent on a single matrix multiplication loop iteration.

This optimization is particularly effective for:
- **Batch processing**: Speedup scales with batch size as matrix operations amortize setup costs
- **Larger networks**: Bigger hidden layers benefit more from optimized GEMM
- **GPU execution**: PyTorch operations can leverage CUDA kernels (original loops cannot)
- **Production inference**: Where the function is called repeatedly on similar-sized inputs

The transformation maintains identical mathematical semantics while leveraging PyTorch's optimized computational graph, making it suitable for any workload using this neural network forward pass.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 January 23, 2026 10:33
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant