Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jan 23, 2026

📄 37,896% (378.96x) speedup for UnoptimizedNeuralNet.forward in code_to_optimize/unoptimized_neural_net.py

⏱️ Runtime : 900 milliseconds 2.37 milliseconds (best of 250 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 379x speedup (from 900ms to 2.37ms) by replacing nested Python loops with PyTorch's highly optimized vectorized operations.

Key Changes:

  1. Matrix multiplication via F.linear(): The original code manually computes fully-connected layers using triple-nested loops (batch × hidden × input dimensions), performing ~23,552 individual scalar operations for the first layer alone. The line profiler shows this taking 71.3% of total runtime. The optimized version replaces this with a single F.linear() call that uses BLAS/LAPACK or CUDA kernels for matrix multiplication, reducing this to just 3.1% of runtime.

  2. ReLU activation with torch.clamp(): The original code loops through every element to manually apply max(0, x), taking 2.2% of runtime. The optimized version uses torch.clamp(hidden, min=0.0), a vectorized C/CUDA operation that processes the entire tensor in parallel.

  3. Softmax via torch.softmax(): The original implementation manually computes max, exponentials, sum, and division across nested loops (~5.2% of runtime combined). The optimized version uses PyTorch's numerically stable torch.softmax(), which is both faster and prevents numerical overflow/underflow issues.

  4. Eliminated temporary tensor allocations: The original code creates many small tensors (torch.tensor(0.0), temp_values, etc.) inside loops, causing significant memory allocation overhead. The optimized version operates on entire tensors at once, drastically reducing memory churn.

Why This Matters:

  • Python loop overhead: Each loop iteration in Python involves significant interpreter overhead. The original code had ~26,438 inner loop iterations per forward pass. Vectorized operations execute in compiled C/CUDA with minimal Python overhead.

  • Hardware acceleration: F.linear() and other PyTorch ops leverage CPU SIMD instructions or GPU parallelism, processing thousands of elements simultaneously rather than sequentially.

  • Memory efficiency: Vectorized operations have better cache locality and avoid the memory allocator being called thousands of times per forward pass.

Impact: This optimization is critical for any workload using neural networks, especially during training (thousands of forward passes) or real-time inference. The 379x speedup transforms this from impractical to production-ready code.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 14 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 4 Passed
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_compiled_neural_net.py::test_compiled_neural_net 100ms 307μs 32518%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_deterministic_output 114ms 354μs 32270%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_range 57.2ms 202μs 28184%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_requires_grad_false 57.3ms 200μs 28426%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_output_shape 57.6ms 203μs 28268%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_softmax_normalization 57.3ms 201μs 28336%✅
test_unoptimized_neural_net.py::TestUnoptimizedNeuralNet.test_zeros_input 56.7ms 201μs 28117%✅
⏪ Click to see Replay Tests
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_pytest_code_to_optimizetestspytesttest_compiled_neural_net_py__replay_test_0.py::test_code_to_optimize_unoptimized_neural_net_UnoptimizedNeuralNet_forward 398ms 698μs 57034%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-UnoptimizedNeuralNet.forward-mkqrenni and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **379x speedup** (from 900ms to 2.37ms) by replacing nested Python loops with PyTorch's highly optimized vectorized operations.

**Key Changes:**

1. **Matrix multiplication via `F.linear()`**: The original code manually computes fully-connected layers using triple-nested loops (batch × hidden × input dimensions), performing ~23,552 individual scalar operations for the first layer alone. The line profiler shows this taking **71.3% of total runtime**. The optimized version replaces this with a single `F.linear()` call that uses BLAS/LAPACK or CUDA kernels for matrix multiplication, reducing this to just **3.1% of runtime**.

2. **ReLU activation with `torch.clamp()`**: The original code loops through every element to manually apply `max(0, x)`, taking **2.2%** of runtime. The optimized version uses `torch.clamp(hidden, min=0.0)`, a vectorized C/CUDA operation that processes the entire tensor in parallel.

3. **Softmax via `torch.softmax()`**: The original implementation manually computes max, exponentials, sum, and division across nested loops (~**5.2%** of runtime combined). The optimized version uses PyTorch's numerically stable `torch.softmax()`, which is both faster and prevents numerical overflow/underflow issues.

4. **Eliminated temporary tensor allocations**: The original code creates many small tensors (`torch.tensor(0.0)`, `temp_values`, etc.) inside loops, causing significant memory allocation overhead. The optimized version operates on entire tensors at once, drastically reducing memory churn.

**Why This Matters:**

- **Python loop overhead**: Each loop iteration in Python involves significant interpreter overhead. The original code had ~26,438 inner loop iterations per forward pass. Vectorized operations execute in compiled C/CUDA with minimal Python overhead.
  
- **Hardware acceleration**: `F.linear()` and other PyTorch ops leverage CPU SIMD instructions or GPU parallelism, processing thousands of elements simultaneously rather than sequentially.

- **Memory efficiency**: Vectorized operations have better cache locality and avoid the memory allocator being called thousands of times per forward pass.

**Impact:** This optimization is critical for any workload using neural networks, especially during training (thousands of forward passes) or real-time inference. The 379x speedup transforms this from impractical to production-ready code.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 January 23, 2026 10:50
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant