Conversation
WalkthroughAdds Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #260 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.04% 96.90% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 3078 3167 +89
==========================================
+ Hits 2987 3069 +82
- Misses 91 98 +7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
The 7 lines missing coverage are all related to providing better error messages. There's little benefit in adding tests that cover these lines. |
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Should be more performant now.
for good measure
In porting #180 to rust (cpp-linter/cpp-linter-rs#260), I found a few spots for improvement. These changes should be more performant when there are staged changes.
In porting #180 to rust (cpp-linter/cpp-linter-rs#260), I found a few spots for improvement. These changes should be more performant when there are staged changes.
In porting #180 to rust (cpp-linter/cpp-linter-rs#260), I found a few spots for improvement. These changes should be more performant when there are staged changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
Tests