Add comparison page for safe numbers vs existing safe numerics #67
Codecov / codecov/project
succeeded
Feb 17, 2026 in 1s
99.6% (target 90.0%)
View this Pull Request on Codecov
99.6% (target 90.0%)
Details
Codecov Report
❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.6%. Comparing base (54c197b) to head (6ca5d40).
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| examples/safe_numerics_comparison.cpp | 87.5% | 11 Missing |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #67 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 99.0% 99.6% +0.7%
=========================================
Files 104 105 +1
Lines 6632 5956 -676
Branches 2242 0 -2242
=========================================
- Hits 6563 5931 -632
- Misses 22 25 +3
+ Partials 47 0 -47 | Files with missing lines | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| examples/safe_numerics_comparison.cpp | 87.5% <87.5%> (ø) |
... and 103 files with indirect coverage changes
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 54c197b...6ca5d40. Read the comment docs.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
- ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Loading