Skip to content

Conversation

@parthban-db
Copy link
Contributor

@parthban-db parthban-db commented Sep 21, 2025

🥞 Stacked PR

Use this link to review incremental changes.


Changes

Update CLI to the latest API Definitions.
This PR also adds the databricks shares list command manually for backward compatibility, which was removed from the API definition.

Why

Tests

Existing CI.

@eng-dev-ecosystem-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eng-dev-ecosystem-bot commented Sep 21, 2025

Run: 17981161486

Env ✅​pass 🙈​skip
✅​ aws linux 312 530
✅​ aws windows 313 529
✅​ aws-ucws linux 425 427
✅​ aws-ucws windows 426 426
✅​ azure linux 312 529
✅​ azure windows 313 528
✅​ azure-ucws linux 425 426
✅​ azure-ucws windows 426 425
✅​ gcp linux 311 531
✅​ gcp windows 312 530

@parthban-db parthban-db force-pushed the parthban-db/stack/update-21sep branch from 48d4670 to bb2ebce Compare September 23, 2025 15:30
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
## Changes
Previously, it was checking only the root type, so it wasn't possible to
have different properties in openapi_overrides and custom overrides of
the same root type

Also updated message to make it more clear:
<img width="982" height="86" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/49493c88-da6e-4e2f-b61f-dfe8141e6170"
/>


## Why
Tests were unexpectedly failing in this PR
#3635

## Tests
<!-- How have you tested the changes? -->

<!-- If your PR needs to be included in the release notes for next
release,
add a separate entry in NEXT_CHANGELOG.md as part of your PR. -->
@parthban-db parthban-db force-pushed the parthban-db/stack/update-21sep branch from 983c355 to 3c16b39 Compare September 24, 2025 11:41
@parthban-db parthban-db marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2025 12:47
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyas-goenka shreyas-goenka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me other than one comment. Looks like TF is still at 0.84? We need TF and the Go SDK to be at the same version in the CLI.

Is there a new TF release planned?

"effective_logical_database_name":
"description": |-
PLACEHOLDER
"lifecycle":
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doc string is being deleted and looks unrelated to the PR. Can we avoid deleting this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair Removed.

@parthban-db parthban-db force-pushed the parthban-db/stack/update-21sep branch from 0e5b587 to a4f2857 Compare September 24, 2025 13:21
@parthban-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good to me other than one comment. Looks like TF is still at 0.84? We need TF and the Go SDK to be at the same version in the CLI.

Go SDK v0.84.0 and v0.85.0 both use the same SHA for the API definition. So, in this case, we can have TF and CLI in different versions of the Go SDK.

@shreyas-goenka shreyas-goenka added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 25, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit c0a0f04 Sep 25, 2025
19 checks passed
@shreyas-goenka shreyas-goenka deleted the parthban-db/stack/update-21sep branch September 25, 2025 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants