Skip to content

Conversation

@rlskoeser
Copy link
Member

@rlskoeser rlskoeser commented Apr 11, 2025

resolves #121

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Expanded and reorganized introductory content to clarify the available examples and resources.
    • Introduced a new section outlining sample notebooks and datasets.
    • Removed redundant demo notebook documentation.
  • Chores

    • Refined example notebooks for a more consistent experience.
    • Updated instructions to clarify proper dataset loading.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request reorganizes and expands the examples documentation. The examples/README.md now features a detailed introduction and a structured "Contents" section outlining available notebooks and sample data. Execution counts in two Jupyter notebooks have been decremented sequentially, with one notebook also updating its dataset file path and associated comment. Additionally, a redundant notebook README file was removed. No changes were made to the public API declarations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
examples/README.md Reorganized introduction and added new "Contents" section listing notebooks and sample data.
examples/edtf-support.ipynb
examples/shakespeare-and-company-project/shxco_partial_date_durations.ipynb
Decremented execution_count values; updated dataset file path and comment in the shxco notebook.
examples/notebooks/README.md Removed file, eliminating redundant notebook documentation.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Simplify example / use-case / notebook organization (#121)

Poem

I'm a bunny with a hop and a rhyme,
Rearranging docs one line at a time.
Execution counts now dance in line,
Paths and data set just fine.
Hooray for changes – carrot crunchin' divine!

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48b0f62 and 6d36928.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/README.md (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
examples/README.md (1)

12-13: Fix indentation for consistency in list items.

The indentation of these list items uses tabs instead of spaces, which is inconsistent with standard Markdown formatting.

-	- Events data from version 1.2 of Shakespeare and Company Project datasets
-	- [Partial date duration logic](shxco_partial_date_durations.ipynb) - compare `undate` partial date range duration logic with a previous implementation in the _Shakespeare and Company Project_ (jupyter notebook)
+  - Events data from version 1.2 of Shakespeare and Company Project datasets
+  - [Partial date duration logic](shxco_partial_date_durations.ipynb) - compare `undate` partial date range duration logic with a previous implementation in the _Shakespeare and Company Project_ (jupyter notebook)
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

12-12: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e3dd84 and 48b0f62.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • examples/shakespeare-and-company-project/SCoData_events_v1.2_2022-01.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • examples/README.md (1 hunks)
  • examples/edtf-support.ipynb (12 hunks)
  • examples/notebooks/README.md (0 hunks)
  • examples/shakespeare-and-company-project/shxco_partial_date_durations.ipynb (42 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • examples/notebooks/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
examples/README.md

12-12: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/shakespeare-and-company-project/shxco_partial_date_durations.ipynb (1)

299-300: Improved dataset organization and path clarity.

The dataset path has been updated to expect the data file in the same directory as the notebook, with a corresponding comment update. This change improves self-containment of the example and makes it clearer where the dataset should be located.

examples/README.md (1)

3-13: Well-structured documentation improves usability.

The expanded introduction and structured Contents section greatly improve clarity about the available examples and their purpose. This makes it easier for users to understand and navigate the examples.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

12-12: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


12-12: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


13-13: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 1

(MD007, ul-indent)


13-13: Hard tabs
Column: 1

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

examples/edtf-support.ipynb (1)

58-692: Sequential execution counts improve notebook readability.

Execution counts have been properly renumbered to start from 1 and proceed sequentially, which improves the clarity of execution flow in the notebook.

@rlskoeser rlskoeser merged commit 3c722fa into develop Apr 11, 2025
6 checks passed
@rlskoeser rlskoeser deleted the feature/cleanup-examples branch April 11, 2025 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants