Skip to content

Conversation

@mima0815
Copy link
Contributor

@mima0815 mima0815 commented Jun 3, 2025

Description

Links

Testing

Checklist

Ensure the following things have been met before requesting a review:

  • Follows all project developer guide and coding standards.
  • Tests have been written for the change, when applicable.
  • Confidential information (credentials, auth tokens, etc...) is not included.

@mima0815 mima0815 force-pushed the refactor/uv branch 3 times, most recently from 9c70fc0 to 65dc431 Compare June 3, 2025 15:54
@RicoFactset
Copy link

RicoFactset commented Jan 14, 2026

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsd271a805-71cd-4fa1-ba7e-32c7ee061f08

Fixed Issues (6)

Great job! The following issues were fixed in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package
HIGH CVE-2025-66418 Python-urllib3-2.2.2
HIGH CVE-2025-66471 Python-urllib3-2.2.2
MEDIUM CVE-2024-12797 Python-cryptography-42.0.6
MEDIUM CVE-2025-50181 Python-urllib3-2.2.2
MEDIUM CVE-2025-50182 Python-urllib3-2.2.2
MEDIUM Hardcoded_Password_in_Connection_String /tests/fds/sdk/utils/authentication/test_confidential.py: 184

Use @Checkmarx to interact with Checkmarx PR Assistant.
Examples:
@Checkmarx how are you able to help me?
@Checkmarx rescan this PR

@mima0815 mima0815 force-pushed the refactor/uv branch 2 times, most recently from c14c729 to e57ae52 Compare January 14, 2026 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants