Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Test Improvements: rules_test.go

File Analyzed

  • Test File: internal/config/rules/rules_test.go
  • Package: internal/config/rules
  • Lines of Code: 622 → 546 (-76 lines, -12%)

Improvements Made

1. Better Testing Patterns

  • Converted manual error checking to testify assertions

    • Replaced all t.Errorf() and if checks with idiomatic testify assertions
    • Added require.NotNil() for critical error checks that should stop the test
    • Used assert.Contains(), assert.Equal(), assert.NotEmpty() for clearer assertions
  • Added testify/require import

    • Properly distinguishes between critical checks (require) and non-critical checks (assert)
    • Use require for error existence checks - test should stop if no error when expected
    • Use assert for field validation - test can continue checking other fields
  • Improved assertion clarity

    • Better error messages that describe what's being tested
    • More expressive assertions (e.g., assert.NotEmpty() instead of checking == "")

2. Code Reduction & Clarity

Before:

  • 53 manual error checks with verbose if statements
  • 3 testify assert calls
  • 0 testify require calls
  • 622 lines of code

After:

  • 0 manual error checks
  • 37 testify assert calls
  • 3 testify require calls
  • 546 lines of code

Improvement: -76 lines (-12%), significantly more concise and readable

3. Specific Improvements by Test

TestPortRange

  • require.NotNil() for error existence (stops test early if no error)
  • assert.Contains() for error message validation
  • assert.Equal() for JSONPath validation

TestTimeoutPositive

  • require.NotNil() for error existence
  • assert.Contains() for error message validation
  • assert.Equal() for JSONPath and Field validation

TestMountFormat

  • require.NotNil() for error existence
  • assert.Contains() for error message validation
  • assert.Equal() for JSONPath pattern validation

TestValidationError_Error

  • assert.Contains() for substring checks
  • ✅ Simplified loop with clear assertions

TestUnsupportedType

  • assert.Equal() for exact field matching
  • assert.Contains() for partial string matching
  • ✅ Eliminated repetitive manual checks

TestUndefinedVariable

  • assert.Equal() for field validation
  • assert.Contains() for message and suggestion checks
  • ✅ Clearer test intent

TestMissingRequired

  • assert.Equal() for all exact matches
  • assert.Contains() for message validation
  • ✅ More concise assertions

TestUnsupportedField

  • assert.Equal() for all field comparisons
  • assert.Contains() for substring validation
  • ✅ Reduced code duplication

TestAppendConfigDocsFooter

  • assert.Contains() for substring checks
  • ✅ Simpler, more readable loop

TestDocumentationURLConstants

  • assert.NotEmpty() instead of manual empty checks
  • assert.True() with clear boolean expressions
  • ✅ More expressive assertions

Test Execution

All tests maintain the same behavior with improved assertions:

go test -v ./internal/config/rules/...

Statistics:

  • 10 test functions (unchanged)
  • Multiple test cases per function (unchanged)
  • 100% of manual checks converted to testify assertions
  • Code reduction: 76 lines removed (12% smaller)

Why These Changes?

This test file was selected because:

  1. Heavy use of manual error checking (53 manual checks) instead of testify assertions
  2. Missing testify/require - no critical error checks that stop test early
  3. Verbose and repetitive - many if statements with similar patterns
  4. Good table-driven structure - already well-organized, just needed better assertions
  5. High improvement potential - easy wins with minimal risk

The improvements make tests:

  • More concise: 12% less code
  • More readable: Clear assertions instead of verbose if statements
  • More idiomatic: Follows Go/testify best practices
  • Better error handling: Distinguishes critical (require) vs non-critical (assert) checks

Before/After Example

Before

if tt.shouldErr {
    if err == nil {
        t.Errorf("Expected error but got none")
        return
    }
    if !strings.Contains(err.Message, tt.errMsg) {
        t.Errorf("Expected error message to contain %q, got %q", tt.errMsg, err.Message)
    }
    if err.JSONPath != tt.jsonPath {
        t.Errorf("Expected JSONPath %q, got %q", tt.jsonPath, err.JSONPath)
    }
}

After

if tt.shouldErr {
    require.NotNil(t, err, "Expected error but got none")
    assert.Contains(t, err.Message, tt.errMsg, "Error message should contain expected text")
    assert.Equal(t, tt.jsonPath, err.JSONPath, "JSONPath should match")
}

Generated by Test Improver Workflow
Focuses on better testify patterns, reduced code, and cleaner assertions

AI generated by Test Improver

- Convert all manual error checking to testify assertions
- Add testify/require for critical error checks
- Replace t.Errorf() with assert.Contains(), assert.Equal(), assert.NotEmpty()
- Reduce code by 76 lines (12% reduction)
- Improve test readability and maintainability

Before: 53 manual checks, 3 asserts, 0 requires
After: 0 manual checks, 37 asserts, 3 requires
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants