-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 917
fix: Correct private forking implementation #3067
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Correct private forking implementation #3067
Conversation
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with |
af34d15 to
f1ef955
Compare
Signed-off-by: Steve Hipwell <steve.hipwell@gmail.com>
f1ef955 to
c5133e4
Compare
| "allow_forking": { | ||
| Type: schema.TypeBool, | ||
| Optional: true, | ||
| Default: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was this default value changed? It's not backwards compatible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lebenitza how can this change not be backwards compatible when the allow_forking wasn't released until after this follow up PR was merged?
Fixes issue introduced with #3056
Before the change?
After the change?
Pull request checklist
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!