Skip to content

Conversation

@richm
Copy link
Contributor

@richm richm commented Sep 5, 2025

  • Pass in a YAML true value as __bootc_validation: true using
    the --extra-vars option to ensure that __bootc_validation is
    treated as a boolean and not a string value.

-e "__bootc_validation: true"

You can also use JSON format:

-e '{"__bootc_validation": true}'

but YAML is simpler in this case.

  • Use tox-lsr version 3.11.1

  • Ensure the citest bad comment works when the test was cancelled in
    addition to the failure case.

  • Update contributing.md documentation

  • Update number of nodes to use in testing farm, if needed

  • remove unnecessary ansible-lint skips

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com

Summary by Sourcery

Roll out recent CI improvements by upgrading dependencies, refining test execution flags, handling cancelled test runs, cleaning up lint skips, and enhancing documentation for local testing

Bug Fixes:

  • Recognize cancelled test runs in the citest bad comment workflow alongside failures

Enhancements:

  • Upgrade tox-lsr dependency to version 3.11.1 across CI workflows
  • Pass __bootc_validation as a YAML boolean instead of a string in CI test commands

CI:

  • Remove unnecessary ansible-lint skips in CI configurations

Documentation:

  • Add local CI testing instructions using tox-lsr and QEMU to contributing.md

* Pass in a YAML true value as `__bootc_validation: true` using
the --extra-vars option to ensure that `__bootc_validation` is
treated as a boolean and not a string value.

`-e "__bootc_validation: true"`

You can also use JSON format:

`-e '{"__bootc_validation": true}'`

but YAML is simpler in this case.

* Use tox-lsr version 3.11.1

* Ensure the citest bad comment works when the test was cancelled in
addition to the failure case.

* Update contributing.md documentation

* Update number of nodes to use in testing farm, if needed

* remove unnecessary ansible-lint skips

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
@richm richm requested a review from spetrosi as a code owner September 5, 2025 21:53
@richm richm self-assigned this Sep 5, 2025
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR refines CI workflows and documentation by ensuring correct boolean handling for __bootc_validation, upgrading tox-lsr to 3.11.1 across jobs, extending the citest bad comment check to capture cancelled runs, and adding detailed local CI testing instructions to contributing.md.

Flow diagram for citest bad comment workflow with cancelled runs

flowchart TD
  Start(["Start workflow"]) --> CheckPending["Check if workflow is still running"]
  CheckPending -->|Still running| Exit1["Exit: Wait for finish"]
  CheckPending -->|Not running| FindRun["Find failed or cancelled run"]
  FindRun -->|Run found| Continue["Continue workflow"]
  FindRun -->|Run not found| Exit2["Exit: Failed workflow not found"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Treat __bootc_validation as YAML boolean via extra-vars
  • Changed extra-vars syntax from -e __bootc_validation=true to -e "__bootc_validation: true"
.github/workflows/qemu-kvm-integration-tests.yml
Bump tox-lsr version to 3.11.1
  • Updated pip3 install URL to version 3.11.1 in CI workflows
.github/workflows/qemu-kvm-integration-tests.yml
.github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml
.github/workflows/ansible-managed-var-comment.yml
.github/workflows/ansible-test.yml
Allow cancelled runs in citest bad comment
  • Extended jq filter to include conclusion == cancelled
.github/workflows/tft_citest_bad.yml
Add local CI testing documentation
  • Inserted 'Running CI Tests Locally' section with qemu and tox-lsr setup steps
contributing.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@richm richm merged commit d6bf6d2 into main Sep 5, 2025
20 checks passed
@richm richm deleted the bootc_validation_bool branch September 5, 2025 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants