Updated README.md #45
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@vitalii-t has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughREADME rewritten with expanded onboarding, detailed Maven/Gradle examples, distinct minimal/sandbox/production/bulk usage flows and extensive full-featured examples; a single method parameter in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Client as MailtrapClient
participant API as Mailtrap Service
rect rgba(135,206,250,0.12)
Note over Dev,Client: Configure client (token, host, optional inboxId, mode)
end
Dev->>Client: instantiate(token, env=sandbox|prod|bulk)
alt Sandbox (email testing)
Client->>API: POST /send (with inboxId param) [sandbox]
API-->>Client: 200 OK (sandbox inbox message)
else Production (transactional)
Client->>API: POST /send [production]
API-->>Client: 202 Accepted
end
alt Bulk/Batch sending
Dev->>Client: switchMode(bulk)
Client->>API: POST /send/bulk (batch payload)
API-->>Client: 202 Accepted (batch id)
end
sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Client as MailtrapClient
Note over Dev,Client: simple flow for switching to Email Testing API
Dev->>Client: switchToEmailTestingApi(inboxId)
Client->>Client: set sendingContextHolder.inboxId = inboxId
Client->>API: subsequent requests target /email-testing using inboxId
API-->>Client: responses reflect sandbox/inbox context
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)
1-36: Clear header and installation instructions — nicely structured.The branding, badges, and installation details across package managers are well-organized and consistent. Prerequisites section is helpful for onboarding.
40-81: Minimal example is clear and complete.Well-structured introductory example with proper error handling and straightforward API usage.
375-390: Contributing and build sections are well-structured.Clear guidance for contributors with proper setup instructions and code of conduct reference.
328-373: All example file paths in the API Reference section are valid and accessible.Verification confirms all 25 example file references in lines 328-373 exist in the repository. No broken links or missing files detected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
README.md (2)
141-149: ❌ CRITICAL BUG NOT FIXED: Bulk stream example still shows incorrect configuration.This is a duplicate of a previous critical issue. The code block still shows
.sandbox(true)and includes.inboxId(INBOX_ID), but the description correctly states it should use.bulk(true)instead. The example code does not match the description and will mislead users attempting to implement bulk sending.Apply this diff to fix the example:
Bulk stream example (optional) differs only by setting `.bulk(true)` instead of `.sandbox(true)`: ```java final MailtrapConfig config = new MailtrapConfig.Builder() - .token(TOKEN) + .token(TOKEN) + .bulk(true) - .sandbox(true) - .inboxId(INBOX_ID) .build(); ```
313-314: ❌ CRITICAL BUG NOT FIXED: Copy-paste error in class reference.This is a duplicate of a previous critical issue. Line 314 incorrectly references
EverythingExample.classwhen this code is part of theFullFeaturedExampleclass. This will cause a ClassLoaderException or runtime error when users attempt to run this example.Apply this diff to correct the class reference:
private static String readAndEncodeAttachment(final String filename) { - try (final InputStream inputStream = EverythingExample.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(filename)) { + try (final InputStream inputStream = FullFeaturedExample.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(filename)) { if (inputStream == null) { return ""; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
330-330: Improve link text descriptiveness.The link text "[here]" is not descriptive. Consider using more meaningful text that conveys what users will find at the destination.
Apply this diff:
-You can find the API reference [here](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html). +You can find the [Javadoc API reference](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
330-330: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
1-374: Well-structured documentation update with comprehensive examples.The README reorganization is excellent—clear prerequisites section, multi-workflow examples (minimal, sandbox/production, switching, full-featured), and expanded API reference with better categorization. The code examples are generally well-formatted and instructive. However, the two critical bugs flagged in the previous review remain unfixed and must be addressed before merging.
Please verify that the two critical bugs (bulk example configuration and class reference) have been intentionally deferred or if this is an oversight that should be corrected in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
327-327: Improve link text for accessibility.The link text "here" is not descriptive for screen reader users. Consider using more descriptive text that makes sense when read out of context.
Apply this diff to improve accessibility:
-You can find the API reference [here](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html). +You can find the [Mailtrap Java API reference](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html) documentation.Alternatively:
-You can find the API reference [here](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html). +The [API reference](https://mailtrap.github.io/mailtrap-java/index.html) is available online.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(3 hunks)src/main/java/io/mailtrap/client/MailtrapClient.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
327-327: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/main/java/io/mailtrap/client/MailtrapClient.java (1)
111-111: LGTM! Good immutability practice.Marking the parameter as
finalprevents accidental reassignment and clarifies intent without changing runtime behavior.README.md (7)
1-36: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive onboarding.The updated header, prerequisites, and installation instructions provide excellent onboarding for new users with all major build tools covered.
38-81: LGTM! Excellent minimal example.The streamlined example focuses on essential parameters only, making it easier for new users to get started quickly.
141-148: Previous issue resolved! Bulk example is now correct.The code now correctly demonstrates bulk configuration with
.bulk(true)instead of.sandbox(true), and appropriately omits.inboxId().
310-319: Previous issue resolved! Class reference is now correct.The resource loader now correctly references
FullFeaturedExample.class, matching the actual class name and preventing runtime errors.
150-196: LGTM! Clear demonstration of API switching.This example effectively demonstrates how to dynamically switch between Production, Bulk, and Sandbox modes, showcasing the client's flexibility.
198-321: LGTM! Comprehensive advanced example.This full-featured example excellently demonstrates HTML emails, inline attachments, custom headers, and template-based sending, providing users with a solid reference for advanced use cases.
325-371: LGTM! Well-organized API reference navigation.The updated API reference section provides clear navigation to all example files, with logical categorization across General, Sending, Testing, Bulk, Contacts, and Email Templates APIs.
Motivation
Actualize README data
Changes
Summary by CodeRabbit