Skip to content

Conversation

@narekhovhannisyan
Copy link
Collaborator

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan commented Nov 27, 2025

Motivation

Changes

  • Change 1
  • Change 2

How to test

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Images and GIFs

Before After
link1 link2
link3 link4
link5 link6
link7 link8
link9 link10

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Simplified package exports to expose a single public entry point, streamlining module imports and improving compatibility.
    • Removed the separate declaration export mapping — this may affect TypeScript declaration resolution in some setups; consumers relying on separate declaration exports should verify their build or editor behavior.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The package.json exports map for "." was simplified: the previous object with "require" and "types" entries was replaced by a single string pointing to "./dist/index.js", removing the explicit "types": "./dist/index.d.ts" export.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Exports simplification
package.json
Replaced the "." export object ({ "require": "./dist/index.js", "types": "./dist/index.d.ts" }) with a single string export "./dist/index.js", removing the "types" mapping under "."

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Review focus: confirm intended TypeScript declaration exposure (removal of "types" under ".") and that consumers relying on that mapping are unaffected.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • IgorDobryn
  • VladimirTaytor
  • mklocek

Poem

🐇 I hopped through package.json tonight,
Trimmed a map to keep the path light,
One dot, one file, tidy and neat,
Dist-bound footsteps soft and fleet. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title claims to add ES module support by specifying import path, but the actual change removes the types path from the main export and simplifies the export structure, which doesn't align with adding ES module support. Update the title to accurately reflect the actual change, such as 'Simplify main export in package.json to single entry point' or provide clarification on how this enables ES module support.
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is a template with placeholder content (Change 1, Change 2, Test 1, Test 2, and dummy image links) that has not been filled in with actual details about the changes, motivation, or testing steps. Replace placeholder content with actual motivation, specific changes made, detailed testing instructions, and relevant before/after images or remove unused sections.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-import-issue

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5f1421 and 7703427.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c72c713 and a5f1421.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

43-50: Verify export field configuration aligns with package resolution standards.

The "import" field has been added, which enables ESM consumers to import this package. However, ensure that:

  1. The build output (dist/index.js) is actually transpiled to ESM format by the TypeScript compiler
  2. If both "import" and "require" must point to the same file, confirm it's in a universally compatible format
  3. Consider whether separate CJS and ESM builds might be needed in the future for better tree-shaking and optimization

You can verify the actual module format by inspecting the generated dist/index.js file after running yarn build.

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2025 17:25
@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 09:24
@narekhovhannisyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai check

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@narekhovhannisyan: I'll review the changes in this PR for you.

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@narekhovhannisyan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai check

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@narekhovhannisyan: I'll review the changes in this PR for you.

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan merged commit ea06f8e into main Dec 4, 2025
4 checks passed
@narekhovhannisyan narekhovhannisyan deleted the fix-import-issue branch December 4, 2025 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants