Skip to content

Conversation

@Norcim133
Copy link
Contributor

@Norcim133 Norcim133 commented May 20, 2025

Adding new Outlook mcp server to README

Description

Added "Outlook Mail + Calendar + OneDrive" server to README

Server Details

New Server

Motivation and Context

Lets users of Microsoft tools turn llm into digital assistant

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested extensively with Claude for Desktop. Used to manage a real inbox and calendar. Tested on real project folders for small enteterprise.

Breaking Changes

N/A

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
  • My changes follows MCP security best practices
  • I have updated the server's README accordingly
  • I have tested this with an LLM client
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Additional context

Environmental variables for mail and calendar are documented. Optional variables required for Drive interaction coming in next version.

olaservo
olaservo previously approved these changes Jul 18, 2025
@domdomegg
Copy link
Member

@claude can you merge in main and fix the merge conflicts? Make sure that the PR results in just one line being added, in the same format as the others, in the right place in alphabetical order.

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Aug 16, 2025

Claude encountered an error —— View job

Failed with exit code 128

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

- Added Outlook Mail + Calendar + OneDrive entry in correct alphabetical order
- Preserved Pacman entry from main in correct alphabetical position
@domdomegg domdomegg merged commit 200c3c2 into modelcontextprotocol:main Aug 16, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants