-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
feature/coveragerc-omit #329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates several configuration files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #329 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.60% 89.18% -6.42%
==========================================
Files 8 2 -6
Lines 273 111 -162
==========================================
- Hits 261 99 -162
Misses 12 12
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coveragerc (1)
11-15: Consider fixing the regex pattern for__main__in exclude_lines.There's a small issue with the pattern for excluding the main module condition.
- if __name__ == .__main__.: # Skips CLI bootstrapping code + if __name__ == ['"]__main__['"].: # Skips CLI bootstrapping codeThe current pattern uses a dot (.) which in regex matches any character, but what you likely want is to match either single or double quotes surrounding
__main__. The suggested pattern will match both'__main__'and"__main__".
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.coveragerc(1 hunks).vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)codecov.yml(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.vscode/settings.json (1)
14-17: Good addition of SonarLint connected mode configuration.Adding SonarLint connected mode configuration is a positive enhancement that will help maintain consistent code quality across the team by connecting to SonarQube/SonarCloud. The connection is properly configured with your user ID and the project key.
.coveragerc (1)
3-9: Well-structured omission rules for coverage reporting.The omission rules are properly configured to exclude files that typically don't require coverage testing, such as
__init__.pyfiles, data models, schemas, and test files themselves. This helps focus coverage metrics on meaningful application logic rather than boilerplate code.codecov.yml (3)
12-12: Changed CI failure condition to a more forgiving option.Changing
if_ci_failedfromerrortosuccessmeans that Codecov will report a successful coverage status even if the CI build fails. This helps separate coverage concerns from other build issues, making your CI process more resilient.
17-17: Added missing configuration for patch coverage.Adding
if_not_found: successto the patch section is a good practice that ensures coverage status isn't blocked when there's no previous report to compare against. This is particularly helpful for new files or first-time contributors.
42-55: Improved ignore patterns with more precise regex syntax.The updated ignore patterns use regex syntax instead of glob patterns, which provides more precise control over what files are excluded from coverage reporting. The patterns align well with the omissions specified in the
.coveragercfile, creating a consistent coverage configuration across tools.



This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit