Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Apr 11, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Refined coverage reporting settings by updating exclusion criteria for files and specific code segments.
    • Enhanced continuous quality integrations with improved connection configurations.
    • Streamlined reporting thresholds to ensure more accurate automated feedback.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several configuration files. The .coveragerc file now omits certain files and directories from code coverage and excludes specific lines from reports. In parallel, the codecov.yml file refines ignore patterns using regex syntax, adjusts the CI failure condition, and removes redundant settings. Additionally, the .vscode/settings.json file receives a new SonarLint configuration for connected mode, specifying the connection ID and project key.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.coveragerc, codecov.yml Coverage configurations updated: Added omit and exclude-lines settings in .coveragerc; in codecov.yml, modified the CI failure condition from error to success, removed the flags section, and replaced glob patterns with regex-based ignore patterns.
.vscode/settings.json Added a new SonarLint connected mode configuration with "connectionId": "nanotaboada" and "projectKey": "nanotaboada_python-samples-fastapi-restful".

Possibly related PRs

  • feature/coverage-settings #328: Updates related to coverage reporting configurations and file exclusion patterns, aligning with the adjustments made in .coveragerc and codecov.yml.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-6.62%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (ab1ae28) 286 274 95.80%
Head commit (9ff186c) 111 (-175) 99 (-175) 89.19% (-6.62%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#329) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.18%. Comparing base (ab1ae28) to head (9ff186c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #329      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.60%   89.18%   -6.42%     
==========================================
  Files           8        2       -6     
  Lines         273      111     -162     
==========================================
- Hits          261       99     -162     
  Misses         12       12              
Components Coverage Δ
Services 79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coveragerc (1)

11-15: Consider fixing the regex pattern for __main__ in exclude_lines.

There's a small issue with the pattern for excluding the main module condition.

-    if __name__ == .__main__.:         # Skips CLI bootstrapping code
+    if __name__ == ['"]__main__['"].:  # Skips CLI bootstrapping code

The current pattern uses a dot (.) which in regex matches any character, but what you likely want is to match either single or double quotes surrounding __main__. The suggested pattern will match both '__main__' and "__main__".

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab1ae28 and 9ff186c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .coveragerc (1 hunks)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • codecov.yml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.vscode/settings.json (1)

14-17: Good addition of SonarLint connected mode configuration.

Adding SonarLint connected mode configuration is a positive enhancement that will help maintain consistent code quality across the team by connecting to SonarQube/SonarCloud. The connection is properly configured with your user ID and the project key.

.coveragerc (1)

3-9: Well-structured omission rules for coverage reporting.

The omission rules are properly configured to exclude files that typically don't require coverage testing, such as __init__.py files, data models, schemas, and test files themselves. This helps focus coverage metrics on meaningful application logic rather than boilerplate code.

codecov.yml (3)

12-12: Changed CI failure condition to a more forgiving option.

Changing if_ci_failed from error to success means that Codecov will report a successful coverage status even if the CI build fails. This helps separate coverage concerns from other build issues, making your CI process more resilient.


17-17: Added missing configuration for patch coverage.

Adding if_not_found: success to the patch section is a good practice that ensures coverage status isn't blocked when there's no previous report to compare against. This is particularly helpful for new files or first-time contributors.


42-55: Improved ignore patterns with more precise regex syntax.

The updated ignore patterns use regex syntax instead of glob patterns, which provides more precise control over what files are excluded from coverage reporting. The patterns align well with the omissions specified in the .coveragerc file, creating a consistent coverage configuration across tools.

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit 5659282 into master Apr 11, 2025
24 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/coveragerc-omit branch April 11, 2025 03:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants