-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
chore: update structure diagram #331
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new commit message linting step to the GitHub Actions workflow, ensuring commit messages adhere to defined standards during the linting process. Additionally, the README.md file has been revised for better clarity and presentation, including updated images and improved references, but without any changes to the project's functional code or public interfaces. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub Actions
participant CommitLint Action
Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push or PR triggers workflow
GitHub Actions->>CommitLint Action: Run commit message lint step
CommitLint Action-->>GitHub Actions: Report linting result
GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Continue workflow or report errors
Tip ⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #331 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.18% 89.18%
=======================================
Files 2 2
Lines 111 111
=======================================
Hits 99 99
Misses 12 12
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgassets/images/structure.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgassets/images/swagger.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/python-app.yml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)
14-14: Review Linus Torvalds quote hyperlink
The quote now links to an archived version—verify this is the desired source and consider using the canonical URL if available.
24-24: Approve revised caption for the structure diagram
The caption clearly communicates that this is a simplified diagram and notes that not all dependencies are shown.
46-46:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify updated API documentation screenshot
Ensure the fileassets/images/swagger.pngis present and reflects the latest API docs screenshot.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify presence of the API documentation image fd --glob 'assets/images/swagger.png'Length of output: 37
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # List files in assets/images to check for presence of swagger.png ls -la assets/images # Search repository for any swagger.png (case-insensitive) find . -type f -iname 'swagger.png'Length of output: 331
Swagger image presence confirmed
The fileassets/images/swagger.pngexists. Please manually verify that this screenshot accurately reflects the latest API documentation.
- assets/images/swagger.png
22-22:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify updated structure diagram asset
Ensure the new imageassets/images/structure.svgexists in the repository and that the alt text accurately describes its content.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify presence of the new structure diagram fd --glob 'assets/images/structure.svg'Length of output: 39
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any SVG files under assets to verify correct path fd assets -e svg # Search for structure.svg anywhere in the repo fd structure.svgLength of output: 65
Verify alt text for structure diagram
The image asset exists at
assets/images/structure.svg. Please confirm that the alt text—“Simplified, conceptual project structure and main application flow”—accurately reflects the updated diagram.
1ff84e2 to
76de1e5
Compare
|



This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit