Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Apr 17, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved clarity and visual presentation in the README, including updated images and enhanced references.
  • Chores
    • Added automated commit message linting to the workflow to enforce consistent commit standards.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new commit message linting step to the GitHub Actions workflow, ensuring commit messages adhere to defined standards during the linting process. Additionally, the README.md file has been revised for better clarity and presentation, including updated images and improved references, but without any changes to the project's functional code or public interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/python-app.yml Added a "Lint commit messages" step using wagoid/commitlint-github-action@v6 in the lint job.
README.md Improved clarity and visuals: updated images, added a source link to a quote, revised captions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant CommitLint Action

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push or PR triggers workflow
    GitHub Actions->>CommitLint Action: Run commit message lint step
    CommitLint Action-->>GitHub Actions: Report linting result
    GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Continue workflow or report errors
Loading

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ff84e2 and 76de1e5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • assets/images/structure.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • assets/images/swagger.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5659282) 111 99 89.19%
Head commit (76de1e5) 111 (+0) 99 (+0) 89.19% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#331) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.18%. Comparing base (5659282) to head (76de1e5).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #331   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.18%   89.18%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         111      111           
=======================================
  Hits           99       99           
  Misses         12       12           
Components Coverage Δ
Services 79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5659282 and 1ff84e2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • assets/images/python-samples-fastapi-restful.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • assets/images/structure.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • assets/images/swagger.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/python-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)

14-14: Review Linus Torvalds quote hyperlink
The quote now links to an archived version—verify this is the desired source and consider using the canonical URL if available.


24-24: Approve revised caption for the structure diagram
The caption clearly communicates that this is a simplified diagram and notes that not all dependencies are shown.


46-46:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify updated API documentation screenshot
Ensure the file assets/images/swagger.png is present and reflects the latest API docs screenshot.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify presence of the API documentation image
fd --glob 'assets/images/swagger.png'

Length of output: 37


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List files in assets/images to check for presence of swagger.png
ls -la assets/images

# Search repository for any swagger.png (case-insensitive)
find . -type f -iname 'swagger.png'

Length of output: 331


Swagger image presence confirmed
The file assets/images/swagger.png exists. Please manually verify that this screenshot accurately reflects the latest API documentation.

  • assets/images/swagger.png

22-22:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify updated structure diagram asset
Ensure the new image assets/images/structure.svg exists in the repository and that the alt text accurately describes its content.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify presence of the new structure diagram
fd --glob 'assets/images/structure.svg'

Length of output: 39


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any SVG files under assets to verify correct path
fd assets -e svg
# Search for structure.svg anywhere in the repo
fd structure.svg

Length of output: 65


Verify alt text for structure diagram

The image asset exists at assets/images/structure.svg. Please confirm that the alt text—“Simplified, conceptual project structure and main application flow”—accurately reflects the updated diagram.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit 7fe3db9 into master Apr 17, 2025
24 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/commitlint branch April 17, 2025 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants