Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented May 18, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a /health endpoint to provide a simple health check for the service.
  • Chores
    • Updated container configuration to include health check support and improved metadata.
  • Tests
    • Introduced a test to verify the /health endpoint responds with status 200 and expected output.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 18, 2025

Walkthrough

A health check endpoint was added to the FastAPI application. The Dockerfile was updated to include a health check using a new shell script, additional metadata labels, and reorganized file copying. New tests verify the /health endpoint. No changes were made to exported or public Python entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Dockerfile Added health check via healthcheck.sh, metadata labels, reorganized file copying, and minor refactoring.
main.py Imported and included health_route.api_router in the FastAPI app.
routes/health_route.py Introduced new /health endpoint using FastAPI's APIRouter.
scripts/healthcheck.sh Added shell script for Docker health check using curl on /health.
tests/test_main.py Added a test for the /health/ endpoint to verify 200 OK and correct JSON response.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant FastAPI App
    participant HealthRoute

    Client->>FastAPI App: GET /health
    FastAPI App->>HealthRoute: Call health_check()
    HealthRoute-->>FastAPI App: {"status": "ok"}
    FastAPI App-->>Client: 200 OK, {"status": "ok"}
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch feature/healthcheck
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.36% 100.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (58c5c3b) 126 114 90.48%
Head commit (5c83358) 131 (+5) 119 (+5) 90.84% (+0.36%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#364) 5 5 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.65%. Comparing base (58c5c3b) to head (5c83358).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #364      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.18%   89.65%   +0.46%     
==========================================
  Files           2        3       +1     
  Lines         111      116       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits           99      104       +5     
  Misses         12       12              
Components Coverage Δ
Services 79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58c5c3b and 5c83358.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • main.py (2 hunks)
  • routes/health_route.py (1 hunks)
  • scripts/healthcheck.sh (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_main.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/test_main.py (1)
tests/conftest.py (1)
  • client (11-13)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (15)
main.py (1)

9-9: Clean implementation of health route integration!

The health route has been properly imported and included in the FastAPI application's routers. This follows the standard pattern for extending the API with new functionality.

Also applies to: 29-29

tests/test_main.py (1)

10-22: Well-structured test for the health endpoint!

The test properly verifies both the status code (200) and response body ({"status": "ok"}), following the existing test pattern in the project. Good job adding test coverage for the new endpoint.

scripts/healthcheck.sh (1)

1-5: Robust and concise health check script!

The script follows shell best practices by using set -e to fail fast and curl --fail to properly handle HTTP error codes. This provides a reliable mechanism for container health verification.

routes/health_route.py (1)

1-15: Well-implemented health check endpoint!

The health route is cleanly implemented following FastAPI best practices, with proper router setup, endpoint definition, and documentation. The simple JSON response is appropriate for a health check endpoint.

Dockerfile (11)

14-17: Pre-built wheels for reproducible builds
Building all dependencies into wheels ensures faster, more reliable installs downstream. The use of --no-cache-dir and a dedicated wheelhouse is spot on.


23-23: Consistent base image for runtime stage
Reusing python:3.13.3-slim-bookworm in the runtime stage guarantees compatibility with the builder artifacts.


26-29: Installing curl for health checks
Good use of a minimal install and immediate cleanup of apt caches to keep the image lean.


30-35: Adding OCI metadata labels
Including descriptive labels (title, description, licenses, source) improves discoverability in container registries. Nice addition.


36-39: Copying documentation early to leverage caching
Moving README.md and assets before dependency install enables better layer caching when docs change less frequently than code.


40-42: Copying wheelhouse from builder stage
Ensures an offline, deterministic installation. This helps in air-gapped environments.


43-47: Installing dependencies from local wheelhouse
The use of --no-index with a local wheel cache plus clean-up of the wheelhouse is a best practice for minimal images.


48-55: Simplified source code copy
Dropping explicit --chown flags is fine since default permissions (0644) allow read access for non-root. This keeps the Dockerfile concise.


61-66: Non-root user and mount-point setup
Creating a fastapi system user and configuring /storage with proper ownership is the right approach for security and writable volumes.


67-68: Unbuffered Python output
Setting PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 early ensures logs are flushed unbuffered—essential for real-time container logging.


74-76: Healthcheck directive using custom script
The HEALTHCHECK exec form with retries and timeouts pointing to healthcheck.sh is correctly configured for container orchestration.

@nanotaboada nanotaboada linked an issue May 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit cc26d37 into master May 18, 2025
22 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/healthcheck branch May 18, 2025 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add /health endpoint for container health checks

2 participants