chore: reorganize and enhance workspace extensions

[nanotaboada]

This change is 

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Expanded VSCode extension recommendations with new categories including AI tools, code quality and linting, version control collaboration, container management, and UI enhancements. Reorganized existing recommendations for better clarity and added explicit exclusions for deprecated or conflicting extensions.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

VSCode extensions.json was expanded with new extension categories including AI tools (Copilot Chat, CodeRabbit), code quality linters, version control collaborations, and UI enhancements. An unwantedRecommendations section was added to exclude deprecated extensions. The file grew from organized groupings to a more comprehensive and structured recommendation set.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
VSCode Configuration .vscode/extensions.json	Expanded and reorganized extension recommendations with new categories: AI-related tools, code quality/linting, version control & collaboration, containers, and UI enhancements. Added unwantedRecommendations section to exclude deprecated or conflicting extensions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/reorganize-extensions-recommendations

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (a120d4f)	131	119	90.84%
Head commit (60eee5d)	131 (+0)	119 (+0)	90.84% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#464)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.65%. Comparing base (a120d4f) to head (60eee5d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #464   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.65%   89.65%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         116      116           
=======================================
  Hits          104      104           
  Misses         12       12           

Components	Coverage Δ
Services	79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes	100.00% <ø> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.