Skip to content

Conversation

@vnktshr21
Copy link
Contributor

  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
  • I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

  • Removed the methods and properties which are present for IVI compliance reasons in RFSG driver, but are not applicable for Python.
  • Removed the methods and properties which are applicable only for hardware which are not supported anymore.

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

None

What testing has been done?

No specific tests are run for the removed API.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.01%. Comparing base (63bf5d4) to head (6fe6747).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2143      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.17%   90.01%   +0.84%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines       18960    18637     -323     
==========================================
- Hits        16908    16777     -131     
+ Misses       2052     1860     -192     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.44% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests 94.65% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests 92.26% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalunittests 68.44% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests 92.72% <ø> (ø)
nifakeunittests 85.52% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests 94.61% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstsystemtests 73.85% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests 81.78% <100.00%> (+5.24%) ⬆️
niscopesystemtests 92.94% <ø> (ø)
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests 91.50% <ø> (ø)
niswitchsystemtests 82.03% <ø> (ø)
nitclksystemtests 94.87% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
generated/nirfsg/nirfsg/_library.py 77.97% <ø> (+7.65%) ⬆️
generated/nirfsg/nirfsg/_library_interpreter.py 74.81% <ø> (+8.19%) ⬆️
generated/nirfsg/nirfsg/session.py 90.11% <100.00%> (+0.67%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 63bf5d4...6fe6747. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ni-jfitzger ni-jfitzger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see anything alarming in the removals and generally take no issue with removals from a beta API. We can always add things back later, if we need them. Just fix the changelog.

Updated CHANGELOG to reflect method and property removals, including those not supported anymore and those necessary for IVI compliance but not applicable for Python.
@ni-jfitzger ni-jfitzger merged commit 8cff730 into ni:master Dec 8, 2025
39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants