Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 16, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, only on Monday ( * 0-3 * * 1 ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from bkeryan and csjall as code owners June 16, 2025 00:31
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 16, 2025 00:31
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Test Results

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 57cb641.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the users/renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from b1a8651 to 57cb641 Compare June 16, 2025 16:08
@bkeryan
Copy link
Collaborator

bkeryan commented Jun 16, 2025

This failure is from updating flake8-import-order:

Run poetry run ni-python-styleguide lint
./src/nitypes/waveform/_timing/_sample_interval/_base.py:15:1: I300 TYPE_CHECKING block should have one newline above.
./src/nitypes/waveform/_timing/_sample_interval/_irregular.py:24:1: I300 TYPE_CHECKING block should have one newline above.
Error: Process completed with exit code 255.

It now lints imports inside if TYPE_CHECKING: blocks, which apparently requires a blank line.

However, 0.19.0 causes a regression with Python 3.9, so ni/python-styleguide#225 is going to block this version.

@bkeryan bkeryan closed this Jun 16, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled June 16, 2025 16:29

Pull request was closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants