-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Fix acknowledge when run on multiple files #244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix acknowledge when run on multiple files #244
Conversation
|
Thank you for contributing! 👋 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes issue #236 where the acknowledge-existing-violations command failed when processing multiple files. The bug occurred because lint re-runs during error acknowledgment were not filtered to the specific file being processed, causing line number and issue mismatches.
Key changes:
- Modified
get_errors_to_processcalls to use[bad_file]instead offile_or_dirto scope lint operations to the current file - Added comprehensive test coverage for multiple file scenarios with both normal and aggressive modes
- Updated pytest and linter configurations to exclude new test input files
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| ni_python_styleguide/_acknowledge_existing_errors/init.py | Fixed lint re-runs to filter to the specific file being processed (lines 92, 131) |
| tests/test_cli/test_acknowledge_existing_errors.py | Added two new test functions to verify multiple file handling works correctly |
| tests/test_cli/acknowledge_existing_errors_multiple_files/input/acknowledge_function_signatures.py | New test input file with various linting violations for testing |
| tests/test_cli/acknowledge_existing_errors_multiple_files/input/acknowledge_doc_lines.py | New test input file with docstring and line length violations |
| tests/test_cli/acknowledge_existing_errors_multiple_files/input/acknowledge_blank_file.py | New empty test input file |
| pyproject.toml | Updated test and linter exclusions to ignore new test input files |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| pass | ||
|
|
||
| def add(self, o): | ||
| """Provide an examples of doc strings that are too long. |
Copilot
AI
Nov 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grammar error: "an examples" should be "an example"
| """Provide an examples of doc strings that are too long. | |
| """Provide an example of doc strings that are too long. |
| pass | ||
|
|
||
| def add(self, o): | ||
| """Provide an examples of doc strings that are too long. |
Copilot
AI
Nov 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grammar error: "an examples" should be "an example"
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def method2(): | ||
| """Provide an examples of doc strings that are too long. |
Copilot
AI
Nov 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Grammar error: "an examples" should be "an example"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes switching all new instances of "Provide an examples" to "Provide an example"
Should fix #236
Turns out that on handling emergent issues (i.e., on a second round), the previous code attempted to process the line number and issue for all files but only in the current file (because re-running the lint was not filtered to the file under work).