Skip to content

Conversation

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member

Please ignore this PR 🙂

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 30, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 30, 2025 4:43pm

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.98%. Comparing base (6b96719) to head (a9de586).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8054   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.98%   72.98%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        8324     8324           
  Branches      215      215           
=======================================
  Hits         6075     6075           
  Misses       2248     2248           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member Author

dario-piotrowicz commented Jul 31, 2025

Closing since there doesn't seem to be any flakiness, also @avivkeller looked into the issue and it sounds like there was an actually legitimate bug (unrelated to open-next, which has since been solved) that caused the flakiness

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz deleted the dario/useless-change-probe-for-open-next-build branch July 31, 2025 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant