Skip to content

Conversation

@LinusU
Copy link
Contributor

@LinusU LinusU commented Aug 21, 2025

Description

Type stripping has been enabled by default in 22.18.0 🎉

ref: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v22.18.0

Validation

It's just a small change the text...

Related Issues

n/a

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing.
  • I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors.
  • I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

Signed-off-by: Linus Unnebäck <linus@folkdatorn.se>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 21, 2025 09:18
@LinusU LinusU requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2025 09:18
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org Ready Ready Preview Aug 21, 2025 0:33am

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Updates documentation to reflect that TypeScript type stripping is now enabled by default in Node.js version 22.18.0, in addition to the previously documented version 23.6.0.

  • Corrects the Node.js version information for default type stripping behavior

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Member

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGMT !

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.17%. Comparing base (d2e9acd) to head (52e13e7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8099   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.17%   73.17%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines        8440     8440           
  Branches      228      228           
=======================================
  Hits         6176     6176           
  Misses       2263     2263           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Co-authored-by: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Signed-off-by: Linus Unnebäck <linus@folkdatorn.se>
@avivkeller avivkeller added fast-track Fast Tracking PRs github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks labels Aug 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Aug 21, 2025
@avivkeller
Copy link
Member

@nodejs/nodejs-website fast tracking

@avivkeller avivkeller enabled auto-merge August 21, 2025 14:04
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟢 100 🟠 88 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 99 🟢 93 🟢 100 🟠 89 🔗
/en/download 🟢 92 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 96 🟢 100 🔗

@avivkeller avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into nodejs:main with commit e6a0cbb Aug 21, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@LinusU LinusU deleted the patch-1 branch August 22, 2025 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-track Fast Tracking PRs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants