fix(blog): apply proper route to metadata call

[bmuenzenmeyer]

Description

The base generateMetadata function is not taking /blog into account.
I don't quite understand this next convention and the params type and how it relates to our code - /blog is not coming in on the initial entrypoint.

This is also affecting the download archive logic. Perhaps we can code-golf a solution that doesn't require duplication.
Live at https://nodejs.org/en/download/archive/v24.10.0

Validation

View title at https://nodejs-org-git-8223-blog-title-openjs.vercel.app/en/blog/release/v24.10.0

Related Issues

Check List

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
• I have run pnpm format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
• I have run pnpm test to check if all tests are passing.
• I have run pnpm build to check if the website builds without errors.
• I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	Ready	Preview	Oct 18, 2025 8:06pm

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes an issue where blog pages were using the incorrect metadata generation route. The change ensures that blog-specific metadata is properly generated by creating a dedicated generateBlogMetadata function that includes the blog prefix in the route path.

• Creates a new generateBlogMetadata function that properly constructs blog metadata routes
• Updates blog pages to use the new blog-specific metadata generation function

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
apps/site/next.dynamic.page.mjs	Adds new generateBlogMetadata function with proper blog route handling
apps/site/app/[locale]/blog/[...path]/page.tsx	Updates blog pages to use the new blog-specific metadata function

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.44%. Comparing base (0aa1281) to head (96735f0).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8224      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.43%   76.44%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        9643     9643              
  Branches      316      317       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         7371     7372       +1     
+ Misses       2271     2270       -1     
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ovflowd]

SGTM!