Skip to content

Conversation

@kiyoon
Copy link
Collaborator

@kiyoon kiyoon commented Jan 2, 2026

Avoids confusion such as #847

And I think it's pretty important that it mentions its requirements clearly.

@clason
Copy link
Collaborator

clason commented Jan 2, 2026

But it is not! That's the whole point of the rewrite. If something doesn't work without, that's a bug. (Probably related to a missing parse() call somewhere.)

@clason clason closed this Jan 2, 2026
@clason
Copy link
Collaborator

clason commented Jan 2, 2026

Sorry, this really needs to work without calling start().

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants