-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
feat: Propagate fatal error on wait for init #1681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: christian.lutnik <christian.lutnik@dynatrace.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @chrfwow, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the error handling within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly propagates fatal stream errors to threads waiting for initialization. The changes introduce a mechanism to store fatal error details and use them to interrupt the initialization wait, throwing a FatalError. The logic is sound and well-tested. I have one critical suggestion to ensure the ErrorCode is correctly propagated within the thrown FatalError, which is necessary for the new tests to pass and aligns with the overall goal of this change.
| if (isFatal) { | ||
| var fatalEvent = fatalProviderEventDetails; | ||
| if (fatalEvent != null) { | ||
| throw new FatalError("Initialization failed due to a fatal error: " + fatalEvent.getMessage()); | ||
| } else { | ||
| throw new FatalError("Initialization failed due to a fatal error."); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The FatalError exception is being thrown without propagating the ErrorCode from fatalProviderEventDetails. The test initAfterFatalPropagatesErrorEvent asserts that the ErrorCode should be PROVIDER_FATAL, but the current FatalError constructor only takes a message. This likely defaults to the GENERAL error code in the underlying OpenFeatureError, which would cause the test to fail.
To ensure the correct error code is propagated, you should use a constructor that accepts an ErrorCode. Assuming FatalError has been updated in the SDK to include a constructor that takes an ErrorCode, you should use it to pass the error code from the event. This will ensure the error code is correctly propagated as intended.
| if (isFatal) { | |
| var fatalEvent = fatalProviderEventDetails; | |
| if (fatalEvent != null) { | |
| throw new FatalError("Initialization failed due to a fatal error: " + fatalEvent.getMessage()); | |
| } else { | |
| throw new FatalError("Initialization failed due to a fatal error."); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (isFatal) { | |
| var fatalEvent = fatalProviderEventDetails; | |
| if (fatalEvent != null && fatalEvent.getErrorCode() != null) { | |
| throw new GeneralError(fatalEvent.getErrorCode(), "Initialization failed due to a fatal error: " + fatalEvent.getMessage()); | |
| } else { | |
| throw new FatalError("Initialization failed due to a fatal error."); | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume that the user only invokes fatalError(...) only with a fatal error. I do not plan to add any checks to that matter, because there is nothing to do in this case.
Therefore I will ignore this comment
This PR
Propagates fatal stream error to thread waiting for initialization
Related Issues
Fixes #1675