Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @danjuv, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the TracingHook to better align with the OpenFeature specification by moving logic to finally_after and enhancing the error hook. The changes are well-implemented and improve spec compliance.
One minor point of clarification: the pull request description mentions that exclude_exceptions defaults to true, but the implementation correctly defaults it to false to maintain backward compatibility. This is the right approach, but the description could be updated to avoid confusion.
I've added one suggestion to further improve alignment with the specification for error event attributes.
hooks/openfeature-hooks-opentelemetry/src/openfeature/contrib/hook/opentelemetry/__init__.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
0670bda to
8706459
Compare
toddbaert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, consistent with the spec.
I'll merge next week unless I hear objections from @gruebel @beeme1mr or @federicobond
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #342 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 98.70% 100.00% +1.29%
===========================================
Files 3 2 -1
Lines 155 98 -57
===========================================
- Hits 153 98 -55
+ Misses 2 0 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…ated on failure Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Danju Visvanathan <danju.visvanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
6014e6b to
165d3e7
Compare
|
Fixed formatting. |
Changes
This PR:
finally_afterso it's run if the hook errorsexclude_exceptionto conditionally generate an exception on error (defaults to false to avoid breaking changes)Done to align with the spec.
fixes #340