Skip to content

Conversation

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor

@mtulio mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

Re-adding the OTE binary extraction for CCM AWS previously added in #30525 and reverted #30744 after SNO job failing with tests exposed by it:

job aggregated-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade-4.22-micro failed blocking job for 4.22.0-0.nightly-2026-02-01-095950.

Skips were added to the OTE implementation by openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c526d0e0-0038-11f1-8671-8cc451fbd60c-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

Previous job failed, skip statement didn't work as skip label was expecting to match SingleNodeTopology but filter was setting SingleNode. I am checking if this makes sense with a hot fix before reviewing whole solution.

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/bbf5f710-0062-11f1-82e4-770c08b5ef46-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

Added a new statement to prevent topology="[SingleReplica SingleReplica]" in the build-log.txt

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1087c530-006b-11f1-8db1-33dbe3ad21f2-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 2, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/4e53c710-006b-11f1-83b3-8a3c785cffe9-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 2, 2026

Reviewing the last change, which propose to fix the topology env setup in SNO, topology="[SingleReplica SingleReplica]" , were confirmed fixed in SNO[1] non-SNO[2] jobs.

Although, the skips for CCM-AWS' OTE e2e wasn't working in SNO job. I will investigate the next steps.

[1] topology="[SingleReplica]" https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2018402103533244416/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/single-node-e2e-test/build-log.txt
[2] topology="[HighlyAvailable]" https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change/2018402507901898752/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt

cc @neisw

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

I just found one interesting behavior on run-upgrade: it isn't setting up the cluster-config. My last commit(e71e227) is proposing to set it and passing it through the life cycle.

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/30d4c1a0-0096-11f1-9682-765365ce9bf7-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/test ?

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/payload-job ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@mtulio: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/testwith openshift/origin/main/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/testwith openshift/origin/main/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

timeout on build, re-trying:

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/testwith openshift/origin/main/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@mtulio: it appears that you have attempted to use some version of the payload command, but your comment was incorrectly formatted and cannot be acted upon. See the docs for usage info.

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1ffc4210-0116-11f1-9819-cd56774c6083-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

Checking if failures are related to cross build or specifically with missing rhcos image in the pipeline affecting any build method:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@mtulio: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/72340150-0123-11f1-8a1f-c489fed6372e-0

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

Checking if failures are related to cross build or specifically with missing rhcos image in the pipeline affecting any build method:

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 3, 2026

/test images

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 4, 2026

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node openshift/cloud-provider-aws#125

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2026
@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Feb 4, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mtulio: This PR has been marked as verified by @mtulio SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784.

Details

In response to this:

/reviewed by @mtulio SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784

✍🏽

/verified by @mtulio SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 5, 2026
@mtulio mtulio force-pushed the ccm-aws-ote-skip-sno branch from 9129b35 to 4f6dfae Compare February 5, 2026 12:31
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2026
@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 5, 2026

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mtulio: This PR has been marked as verified by @mtulio SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784.

Details

In response to this:

PR rebased, re-stamping same verify label:

/verified by @mtulio SNO jobs are now passing with skipped tests: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-cloud-provider-aws-125-openshift-origin-30747-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node/2019041978443894784

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcpowermac, mtulio, neisw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0095365 and 2 for PR HEAD 4f6dfae in total

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 6, 2026

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

1 similar comment
@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 6, 2026

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtulio commented Feb 6, 2026

Job e2e-aws-ovn-fips are failing caused by CI infrastructure

And job e2e-aws-ovn-microshift is caused by sig-storage tests

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Feb 6, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

unrelated flakes and failures

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@neisw: Overrode contexts on behalf of neisw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

unrelated flakes and failures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@mtulio: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 979ea7d into openshift:main Feb 6, 2026
20 checks passed
@mtulio mtulio deleted the ccm-aws-ote-skip-sno branch February 6, 2026 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants