Skip to content

nat64_appliance image workflow #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2026
Merged

nat64_appliance image workflow #154

openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2026
+237 −0

Conversation

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor

@hjensas hjensas commented Dec 12, 2025 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

Add a workflow to build the nat64_appliance on a weekely schedule and create a uniq release and update the "latest" tag.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3550
Jira: OSPNW-1233
Assisted-By: Claude Code/claude-4.5-sonnet

@dpulls
Copy link

dpulls bot commented Dec 12, 2025

⚠️ Dpulls not installed on repository openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework. Checkout our quickstart for how to install.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abays and olliewalsh December 12, 2025 14:51
@hjensas
nat64_appliance image workflow
19cea63 
Add a workflow to build the nat64_appliance on a weekely
schedule and create a uniq release and update the "latest"
tag.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3550

Assisted-By: Claude Code/claude-4.5-sonnet
Signed-off-by: Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
@hjensas hjensas force-pushed the nat64_appliance_workflow branch from 85545b4 to 19cea63 Compare December 12, 2025 14:55
@dpulls
Copy link

dpulls bot commented Dec 12, 2025

⚠️ Dpulls not installed on repository openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework. Checkout our quickstart for how to install.

1 similar comment
@dpulls
Copy link

dpulls bot commented Dec 12, 2025

⚠️ Dpulls not installed on repository openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework. Checkout our quickstart for how to install.

@eduolivares
Copy link
Contributor

eduolivares commented Dec 16, 2025

lgtm and it was tested here:
https://github.com/hjensas/openstack-k8s-operators-ci/actions/runs/20170240590/job/57903751648

let's wait until openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3550 is merged

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor Author

hjensas commented Dec 19, 2025

openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3550 is merged now.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 19, 2025
@belolipa
Copy link

belolipa commented Jan 7, 2026

/approve

@stuggi stuggi added the approved label Jan 7, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: belolipa, eduolivares, hjensas

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 28be92b into openstack-k8s-operators:main Jan 7, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eduolivares eduolivares eduolivares approved these changes

@belolipa belolipa belolipa approved these changes

@abays abays Awaiting requested review from abays

@olliewalsh olliewalsh Awaiting requested review from olliewalsh

Assignees

@eduolivares eduolivares

@belolipa belolipa

Labels

approved lgtm

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hjensas @eduolivares @belolipa @stuggi