Skip to content

🎯 Core Node Types and Naming Conventions#3

Open
rowanc1 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
rfc0003
Open

🎯 Core Node Types and Naming Conventions#3
rowanc1 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
rfc0003

Conversation

@rowanc1
Copy link
Member

@rowanc1 rowanc1 commented Feb 3, 2026

This opens up the initial nodes. I have opted not to talk about a document/root type yet (maybe a mistake?). I am hoping these are not controversial. The naming convention needs some review, I went back and forth and don't quite remember the conversations in November or where we landed.

@rowanc1 rowanc1 requested a review from nokome February 3, 2026 01:45
@rowanc1 rowanc1 added the draft An RFC pull request in draft. label Feb 3, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Curvenote Preview

Directory Preview Checks Updated (UTC)
content/RFC0003 🔍 Inspect 11 checks passed (2 optional) Feb 3, 2026, 1:51 AM

Copy link

@tarleb tarleb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thumbs up from here 👍

I'd like to throw out there the idea of renaming Code to CodeListing, just because that seems like a nice name and would keep naming closer to HTML. But I also like the "blocks first" naming convention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

draft An RFC pull request in draft.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants