Skip to content

Conversation

@daveshanley
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

`BundleInlineRefs` was not operating correctly, it got refactored out of use.

Added some docs and clarification, and resolved the bundler behavior
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.26549% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.41%. Comparing base (7b6048a) to head (f007b93).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bundler/bundler.go 81.03% 17 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #514      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.50%   99.41%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         190      191       +1     
  Lines       23013    23154     +141     
==========================================
+ Hits        22900    23019     +119     
- Misses         68       85      +17     
- Partials       45       50       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.41% <90.26%> (-0.10%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

ensure we hit the defensive check
Now we can track the origins of all the references from the composed bundled doc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants