Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities#13

Open
patinthehat wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-aa4a1af092f5b40e2a207bed842da207
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities#13
patinthehat wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-aa4a1af092f5b40e2a207bed842da207

Conversation

@patinthehat
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the package-lock.json, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-15053838
  87  
medium severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
  60  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-aa4a1af092f5b40e2a207bed842da207

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2c339ea9b1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 26 to +28
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^4.25.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "^4.25.0",
"eslint": "^7.27.0",
"eslint": "^9.26.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Align eslint major with @typescript-eslint peer range

Upgrading eslint to ^9.26.0 while keeping @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin/parser at 4.25.0 introduces a peer-dependency mismatch: those versions declare eslint support only for ^5 || ^6 || ^7 (see package-lock.json lines 254–305). In a clean install or CI with peer-deps enforced, npm install will warn or fail and linting scripts in package.json will not run reliably. Either upgrade the TypeScript ESLint packages to a version that supports ESLint 9 or keep ESLint within the supported range.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments