[Dockerfile] Switch to wolfi/glibc based image #4261
+99
−116
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello ejabberd team,
@badlop as discussed some time ago, during a simple
processone/rtbtest with the Alpine/musl-libc based container image, I ran into issues when spawning 5-10k users on the container. After digging arround and spending some time, what effectively solved all issues was just using a glibc based variant and the container became well performing.Switching to the proposed wolfi/os image has the following qualities:
Additionally, the github workflows could drop the binary builds for
musl-libcwhich have been the work-around also for the QEMU bug blocking buildingarm64variants.Therefore, this PR includes:
wolfiinstead ofAlpinepackageimagesI was not yet able to test the workflows, maybe need to do some fine tuning here when they have been triggered.
Thanks and until soon!
Saarko