Skip to content

Conversation

@gerrod3
Copy link
Contributor

@gerrod3 gerrod3 commented Sep 8, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@ggainey ggainey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Specifically respond to twine's recent changelog "Remove hacks that support --skip-existing for indexes other than PyPI and TestPyPI"

@ggainey ggainey merged commit 2b34643 into pulp:main Sep 8, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Backport to 3.11: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 2b34643 on top of patchback/backports/3.11/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

Backporting merged PR #957 into main

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.11/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957 upstream/3.11
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.11/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Backport to 3.12: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 2b34643 on top of patchback/backports/3.12/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

Backporting merged PR #957 into main

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.12/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957 upstream/3.12
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.12/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Backport to 3.13: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 2b34643 on top of patchback/backports/3.13/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

Backporting merged PR #957 into main

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.13/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957 upstream/3.13
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.13/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Backport to 3.10: 💔 cherry-picking failed — conflicts found

❌ Failed to cleanly apply 2b34643 on top of patchback/backports/3.10/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

Backporting merged PR #957 into main

  1. Ensure you have a local repo clone of your fork. Unless you cloned it
    from the upstream, this would be your origin remote.
  2. Make sure you have an upstream repo added as a remote too. In these
    instructions you'll refer to it by the name upstream. If you don't
    have it, here's how you can add it:
    $ git remote add upstream https://github.com/pulp/pulp_python.git
  3. Ensure you have the latest copy of upstream and prepare a branch
    that will hold the backported code:
    $ git fetch upstream
    $ git checkout -b patchback/backports/3.10/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957 upstream/3.10
  4. Now, cherry-pick PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 contents into that branch:
    $ git cherry-pick -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
    If it'll yell at you with something like fatal: Commit 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9 is a merge but no -m option was given., add -m 1 as follows instead:
    $ git cherry-pick -m1 -x 2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9
  5. At this point, you'll probably encounter some merge conflicts. You must
    resolve them in to preserve the patch from PR Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal #957 as close to the
    original as possible.
  6. Push this branch to your fork on GitHub:
    $ git push origin patchback/backports/3.10/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957
  7. Create a PR, ensure that the CI is green. If it's not — update it so that
    the tests and any other checks pass. This is it!
    Now relax and wait for the maintainers to process your pull request
    when they have some cycles to do reviews. Don't worry — they'll tell you if
    any improvements are necessary when the time comes!

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

@patchback
Copy link

patchback bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Backport to 3.19: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.19/2b34643299835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

Backported as #958

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

patchback bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal

(cherry picked from commit 2b34643)
@gerrod3 gerrod3 deleted the skip-exist-remove branch September 8, 2025 20:39
gerrod3 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
…835462a4add6b3b76d2d8309bf91d9/pr-957

[PR #957/2b346432 backport][3.19] Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal
gerrod3 pushed a commit to gerrod3/pulp_python that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
Remove testing of twine's --skip-existing due to twine feature removal

(cherry picked from commit 2b34643)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants