[3.14] Fix typing.TYPE_CHECKING docs to reflect PEP 649. (GH-134813) #134822
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649 makes all that unnecessary. (cherry picked from commit d7256ae) Co-authored-by: larryhastings <larry@hastings.org>
miss-islington
requested review from
AlexWaygood and
JelleZijlstra
as code owners
bedevere-app
bot
added
skip issue
skip news
awaiting review
docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
typing.TYPE_CHECKING should no longer steer users towards
manual or automatic stringization (and PEP 563); PEP 649
makes all that unnecessary.
(cherry picked from commit d7256ae)
Co-authored-by: larryhastings larry@hastings.org
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--134822.org.readthedocs.build/