-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
Reorganize object store metrics #5821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rdettai
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
revamp-storage-metrics
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if it is ttfb it should be not be called duration!?
(technically I don't think this is ttfb btw :-/ )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I agree the terminology TTFB is a bit stretched here as it also applies to other types of queries (deletes). And it's probably not a good idea to call it request duration for GET requests when it doesn't measure the whole download duration.
I still think it's valuable to measure the time it takes for get requests to get to the byte stream. It's valuable when trying to configure the StorageTimeoutPolicy, and it's also a way to measure the read performance of the object store without having to normalize by the downloaded size. Would you be fine with calling that separate metric
object_storage_get_ttfbor do you still think it's not appropriate?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rdettai what are we measuring exactly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fmassot The storage SDK returning a ByteStream.
We can hope most of the meta data layer stuff is done at this point.
@rdettai-sk
My comment had two parts.
ttfb-likefor instance.I think we need to rename that metric and keep it...
And then, count + duration total + num bytes total.
With that, at least we have enough to compute a model
TTFB + bytes * throughput.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To summarise the changes on existing metrics:
help: "TTFB-like latency of the object store get requests in seconds. This doesn't include the time to download the full response payload."help: "Duration in seconds of the object store request"I can add a metric to measure the total duration (download included). Should it be a counter or a histogram?