derive(PartialEq) via bitwise comparison where possible

[saethlin]

No description provided.

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 4ca5d88 (4ca5d8859eb246cbe04c84e29d4429f61cd2165e, parent: 42ec52babac2cbf2bb2b9d794f980cbcb3ebe413)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4ca5d88): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[0.3%, 1.4%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.5%, -0.1%]	16
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-1.3%, -0.1%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.5%, 0.2%]	19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.1%	[2.1%, 2.1%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.1%	[2.1%, 2.1%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary -0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.2%, -3.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1

Bootstrap: 471.257s -> 470.709s (-0.12%)
Artifact size: 388.26 MiB -> 388.27 MiB (0.00%)

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: e44f742 (e44f742bf18fd0d12074d5616b865b3b06408b46, parent: f40a70d2bcd830a4f1f8c7ca1a7f93f1d9d703d6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e44f742): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.2%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.0%	[0.2%, 1.3%]	11
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.1%]	21
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-1.2%, -0.1%]	40
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, 0.2%]	24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 1.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary -2.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.4%, -2.4%]	1

Binary size

Results (secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.1%, 0.2%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 469.915s -> 474.851s (1.05%)
Artifact size: 386.98 MiB -> 386.96 MiB (-0.00%)

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: b5d9019 (b5d90197198f0cf8d1d63e6c89d591cdc0fee505, parent: da2544bfbe84df7b24d83c029c74299ebf6112c6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (b5d9019): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.1%, 0.2%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[0.3%, 1.4%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.1%]	25
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-1.2%, -0.0%]	32
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.6%, 0.2%]	28

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 6.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	6.8%	[6.8%, 6.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	6.8%	[6.8%, 6.8%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 3.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.4%	[2.4%, 5.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.2%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-1.0%, 0.3%]	3

Bootstrap: 471.557s -> 469.215s (-0.50%)
Artifact size: 388.95 MiB -> 388.87 MiB (-0.02%)

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 3c3569a (3c3569a7a0d01d4956cb13b0c8985f54c24ab633, parent: ba86c0460b0233319e01fd789a42a7276eade805)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (3c3569a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.4%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.4%	[0.2%, 2.9%]	16
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.6%, -0.1%]	18
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-1.2%, -0.1%]	27
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.6%, 0.4%]	21

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.6%, secondary 2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.8%	[3.8%, 3.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[1.6%, 3.6%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.6%, -0.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.6%	[-0.6%, 3.8%]	2

Cycles

Results (secondary 1.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.8%	[3.8%, 8.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-3.2%, -2.3%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.5%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.3%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.5%]	3

Bootstrap: 470.7s -> 471.689s (0.21%)
Artifact size: 388.87 MiB -> 388.87 MiB (-0.00%)

[saethlin]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 9dfaa96 (9dfaa96c7c0cfbd82e36663fa4b5796df7628d89, parent: ba2142a19c1acabe770433418fa395b8a0ef47a4)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (9dfaa96): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.1%, 1.0%]	62
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.9%	[0.0%, 32.4%]	69
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.3%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.9%	[-2.7%, -0.1%]	24
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[-0.4%, 1.0%]	68

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.6%, secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.8%	[1.4%, 2.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.5%, -0.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.7%	[-3.7%, -3.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.5%, -0.7%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary 4.2%, secondary 14.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.2%	[2.2%, 14.7%]	32
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	14.6%	[2.1%, 365.7%]	35
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	4.2%	[2.2%, 14.7%]	32

Binary size

Results (primary -0.4%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	7
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.0%, -0.1%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.0%, 0.0%]	3

Bootstrap: 470.113s -> 470.64s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 388.98 MiB -> 389.07 MiB (0.02%)