Introduce a required style_edition input for Diff Check
#6742
+45
−14
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Caution
Stacked on top of #6741.
So that when manually dispatching the Diff Check workflow, an explicit style edition is specified.
Note that the style edition specified with
style_editioninput can still be overridden byrustfmt_configs, but the intention is to make sure thestyle_editionis always specified.Context: #6681 (comment)
Style edition via
--style-edition=$STYLE_EDITIONvs--config=style_edition=$STYLE_EDITIONSee discussion in #t-rustfmt > style edition flag vs config.
In this PR I use the
--config=style_edition=$STYLE_EDITIONform, because I'm not actually sure what's the precedence order of mixed invocations (example below), so I just used--config=style_edition=$STYLE_EDITIONwhere laterstyle_editionsspecified in optionalrustfmt_configsshould take precedence over this input.Review remarks
The first commit in this PR is a drive-by fix for
rusfmt->rustfmtthat was bothering me, should not contain any functional changes.The second commit is the actual script/workflow change.