Skip to content

Conversation

@cathay4t
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Gris Ge <fge@redhat.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @cathay4t, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the accuracy of the documentation for the LinkBridge struct. It addresses a minor but important detail by correcting a descriptive comment, ensuring that the purpose of the interface is clearly and correctly communicated to developers using the code.

Highlights

  • Documentation Correction: Corrected a typo in the documentation comment for the LinkBridge struct, changing "dummy interface" to "Linux Bridge interface" to accurately reflect its purpose.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a documentation comment for LinkBridge, changing it from 'dummy interface' to 'Linux Bridge interface'. This improves the accuracy of the documentation. I've added one suggestion to further improve the comment to align with common Rust documentation conventions. Overall, a good and necessary fix.

};

/// Represent dummy interface.
/// Represent Linux Bridge interface.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change is a good correction, the comment can be further improved to align with Rust API documentation guidelines. Doc comments for types should typically be a full sentence ending with a period. Using the third-person singular verb form is also conventional.

Suggested change
/// Represent Linux Bridge interface.
/// Represents a Linux Bridge interface.

@cathay4t cathay4t merged commit a994f72 into rust-netlink:main Dec 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@cathay4t cathay4t deleted the new_route branch December 24, 2025 06:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant