Skip to content

Improvement/cldsrv 845 fix includes on set#6076

Merged
bert-e merged 3 commits intodevelopment/9.1from
improvement/CLDSRV-845-fix-includes-on-set
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Improvement/cldsrv 845 fix includes on set#6076
bert-e merged 3 commits intodevelopment/9.1from
improvement/CLDSRV-845-fix-includes-on-set

Conversation

@benzekrimaha
Copy link
Contributor

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha commented Feb 5, 2026

Issue: CLDSRV-845

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 5, 2026

Hello benzekrimaha,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.77%. Comparing base (7671fbe) to head (f30c524).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on development/9.1.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/utilities/reportHandler.js 69.26% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.1    #6076      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            83.81%   83.77%   -0.05%     
===================================================
  Files                  191      191              
  Lines                12350    12350              
===================================================
- Hits                 10351    10346       -5     
- Misses                1999     2004       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 66.88% <0.00%> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 27.02% <0.00%> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.17% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.19% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 34.27% <0.00%> (ø)
sur-tests 35.42% <0.00%> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 36.48% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
unit 69.66% <100.00%> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 33.40% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-845-fix-includes-on-set branch from 2bfcfb9 to 0c44ba8 Compare February 5, 2026 16:12
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 5, 2026
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 16:14
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 5, 2026
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 5, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 5, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@francoisferrand francoisferrand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also need a version bump [+ on each waterflow]
Not sure about the branch name though, Bert-e may complain about improvement branch for a bug ticket...

@francoisferrand francoisferrand force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-845-fix-includes-on-set branch from f1fa000 to f30c524 Compare February 5, 2026 17:52
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

/bypass_author_approval

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 5, 2026
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

/create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 5, 2026
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 5, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.1

  • ✔️ development/9.2

  • ✔️ development/9.3

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-845.

Goodbye benzekrimaha.

The following options are set: bypass_author_approval, create_integration_branches

@bert-e bert-e merged commit f30c524 into development/9.1 Feb 5, 2026
29 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-845-fix-includes-on-set branch February 5, 2026 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants