Improves documentation covering the creation of recipes for local containers.#652
Conversation
| /home/vanessa/Desktop/Code/shpc/registry/dinosaur/salad/container.yaml | ||
|
|
||
| At this point, you should open up the container.yaml generated and edit to your liking. | ||
| The container image will be copied within the newly-created directory structure, alongside the `container.yaml` file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
More specifically, it will be put in container_base that could be a custom path specified by the user:
singularity-hpc/shpc/settings.yml
Line 43 in 2a2e30c
Also, if they create a module with a local path defined (example here) the container will not be copied, but rather preserved in that path (and referenced as such in the container.yaml). We do this for use cases where you have a huge archive of existing containers, and just want to make separate modules for them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@vsoch thanks for the explanation, I like these features. When you say
if they create a module with a local path defined
You mean creating the container.yaml manually, and NOT using the shpc add ... command. Is that correct? Because using the shpc add command creates a copy by default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, the example I linked is using the same logic as shpc add, but from within Python to specify a specific container path to write into the container.yaml recipe and not do a copy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So this is something you can do programmatically using SHPC as a Python module, but is there a way to enable keep_path through the shpc command line tool?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not currently - it’s just provided as that example right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I haven't tested closely, but here is something to try! #656 I both exposed keep_path to add, and also enforced using container_base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is great, looks correct to me. When will it be merged? So I can update this PR accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dipietrantonio I was hoping you might test out the two changes?
- add with a custom container path
- fixing the bug to honor container_base
When you've confirmed it works as expected we can merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest merging this PR as it actually describes what happens. Then change the documentation again when you fix the bug.
Make it clear that the container image is bundled with the recipe when adding a local container.
2 participants
Make it clear that the container image is bundled with the recipe when adding a local container.
This pull request addresses singularityhub/shpc-registry#113