Skip to content

Conversation

@cmeesters
Copy link
Collaborator

@cmeesters cmeesters commented Nov 17, 2025

merely a naming issue to resolve all wildcards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced log file organization to better differentiate logs by file type, making it easier to identify and troubleshoot issues related to specific file types during data processing workflows.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Modified the gunzip rule in the Snakemake workflow to include the {filetype} component in the log file path. This changes log file naming from logs/gunzip/{database}_{dataset}_{name}.log to logs/gunzip/{database}_{dataset}_{name}_{filetype}.log, enabling per-filetype log differentiation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Log path update
workflow/rules/preparation.smk
Updated gunzip rule log filename to include {filetype} component for differentiated per-filetype logging

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Logs now sorted, neat and clean,
Filetypes tagged in each routine,
Gunzip hops with organized care,
Each file finds its logged pair! 📋

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/gunzip_logfile

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b955211 and ad93149.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • workflow/rules/preparation.smk (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cmeesters cmeesters merged commit 5c8a5e3 into main Nov 17, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@cmeesters cmeesters deleted the fix/gunzip_logfile branch November 17, 2025 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants