docs: update return annotations to use ndarray instance notation in stats/range-by

[Sachinn-64]

Resolves None.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• docs: update return annotations to use ndarray instance notation in stats/range-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• #{{TODO: add related issue number}}

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/range-by	$\color{green}161/161$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}0/0$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}161/161$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

LGTM after clean-up. Note that many of the annotations in the README were incorrect, especially with incorrect dimensionality. The dimensionality of the nested array in the return annotation should match the dimensionality of the ndarray.

[Sachinn-64]

Thanks @kgryte! Noted — I’ll make sure the README annotations and dimensionality are correct going forward.

[kgryte]

@Orthodox-64 Ideally, our doctest linter would catch when the dimensionality is incorrect. So it seems like there is a bug in our implementation. It correctly errors when dimensionality matches but values differ. Sigh. Another thing to look into.

[Sachinn-64]

@kgryte Thanks for the clarification. Understood — this appears to be a doctest linter issue and something we should look into. Appreciate the note.