Skip to content

Comments

fix: markdown lint error in utils/object-inverse#9438

Merged
kgryte merged 5 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
Neerajpathak07:fix-object-inverse
Dec 30, 2025
Merged

fix: markdown lint error in utils/object-inverse#9438
kgryte merged 5 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
Neerajpathak07:fix-object-inverse

Conversation

@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member

Progresses #8755

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Fixes pre-requisite markdown lint error in utils/object-inverse

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

  • none

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}


@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
utils/object-inverse $\color{green}182/182$
$\color{green}+0.00%$
$\color{green}20/20$
$\color{green}+0.00%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+0.00%$
$\color{green}182/182$
$\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 marked this pull request as ready for review December 30, 2025 09:40
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Dec 30, 2025
@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 added the Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. label Dec 30, 2025
@kgryte kgryte removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Dec 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. In general, if you have an opportunity to clean-up/beautify/modernize examples, you are encouraged to take it. Think of maintenance as tending to a garden. As you tend to various flowers, be sure to pull out the weeds.

@kgryte kgryte merged commit 6d021ff into stdlib-js:develop Dec 30, 2025
12 checks passed
@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

@kgryte Really great advice I'll take up the initiative in 'modernizing' the examples and make sure to keep it in line for future packages!!

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 deleted the fix-object-inverse branch December 30, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants