Skip to content

Conversation

@Om-A-osc
Copy link


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:

  • task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  • task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  • task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  • task: lint_python
    status: na
  • task: lint_r
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  • task: lint_shell
    status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  • task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed

Description

While investigating a separate issue, I ran make lint-pkg-json and found that the lint_package_json check was failing for one of the packages.

The failure was caused by a missing devDependencies field in package.json. According to the package.json schema enforced by the linting pipeline, devDependencies is a required field. As a result, the Ajv schema validator was flagging this omission as an error.

This pull request fixes the issue by adding the appropriate devDependencies field, bringing the package metadata back into compliance with the schema and allowing the lint step to pass.

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

No.

Checklist

AI Assistance

  • Yes
  • No

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 20, 2026
@Om-A-osc
Copy link
Author

Hi @kgryte and @Planeshifter, please review and merge when convenient. All package-json lints are passing now.
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants