Skip to content

Conversation

@Om-A-osc
Copy link
Contributor

@Om-A-osc Om-A-osc commented Jan 24, 2026


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:

  • task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  • task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  • task: lint_python
    status: na
  • task: lint_r
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  • task: lint_shell
    status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  • task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed

Resolves no issues.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request fixes a linting error reported by the stdlib/no-new-array rule by replacing usage of the new Array() constructor with array literals and incremental push operations, in accordance with project linting and style guidelines.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

Disclosure

Not applicable.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 24, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/ranks $\color{red}491/493$
$\color{green}+99.59%$
$\color{red}67/68$
$\color{green}+98.53%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{red}491/493$
$\color{green}+99.59%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants