[pull] master from ruby:master#493
Merged
pull[bot] merged 10 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom Nov 21, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This will make reading the parameters nicer for the JITs. Should be no-op for the C side.
Going through a call to a C function just to read a bitfield was a little extreme. We did it to be super conservative since bitfields have historically been the trigger of many bugs and surprises. Let's try directly accessing them with code from rust-bindgen. If this ends up causing issues, we can use the FFI approach behind nicer wrappers. In any case, directly access regular struct fields such as `lead_num` and `opt_num` to remove boilerplate.
…e gem` ``` Offenses: Rakefile:18:1: C: [Correctable] Layout/EmptyLines: Extra blank line detected. Diff: @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ ext.lib_dir = "lib/test_gem" end + task default: :compile ruby/rubygems@8c414729df
Comparing version objects is a huge bottleneck in dependency solvers
(like inside Bundler). I would like to make comparing version objects
cheaper. Right now we support comparing version objects with strings by
trying to coerce the string to a version. So for example:
```ruby
Gem::Version.new("1") <=> "12"
```
I would like to deprecate and remove support for this feature so that we
can reduce the overhead of `def <=>`.
I'm not sure what version of RubyGems we could remove this from though.
ruby/rubygems@81b7602183
…nFinder If we use "system" variable in BUNDLE_VERSION on Bundler configuration, we can use bundler version provided by system installation. But the current logic returns the first activated version of bundler like 2.7.2. It makes to confuse users. ruby/rubygems@4eb66d9549
(ruby/rubygems#9095) * Rescue when deleting a non-existent cached gem file When a gem was in the cache, but another process deletes it first, this delete command fails. To work around this, I'm rescuing from Errno::ENOENT and swalling the error. The file is gone, and we can move on. * Apply suggestion from @kou Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> --------- ruby/rubygems@b30bcbc648 Co-authored-by: Hiroshi SHIBATA <hsbt@ruby-lang.org> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )