Skip to content

Conversation

@benesjan
Copy link
Contributor

@benesjan benesjan commented Jan 5, 2026

Fixes F-115

We have not yet handled reorgs in PrivateEventStore. In this PR I tackle that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

benesjan commented Jan 5, 2026

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@benesjan benesjan requested a review from mverzilli January 5, 2026 21:14
Copy link
Contributor

@mverzilli mverzilli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lovely! 🚢

@benesjan benesjan enabled auto-merge January 6, 2026 17:29
@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the 01-05-fix_handle_reorgs_in_private_event_store branch from 1720887 to 293608e Compare January 6, 2026 17:32
@benesjan benesjan disabled auto-merge January 6, 2026 17:33
Fixes F-115

We have not yet handled reorgs in `PrivateEventStore`. In this PR I tackle that.
@AztecBot AztecBot force-pushed the 01-05-fix_handle_reorgs_in_private_event_store branch from 293608e to 0757470 Compare January 6, 2026 17:35
@AztecBot AztecBot enabled auto-merge January 6, 2026 17:35
@AztecBot AztecBot added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 6, 2026
Merged via the queue into next with commit bd01158 Jan 6, 2026
17 checks passed
@AztecBot AztecBot deleted the 01-05-fix_handle_reorgs_in_private_event_store branch January 6, 2026 18:35
AztecBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
As Martin mentioned [here](#19327 (comment)) makes sense to have the reorg handling be atomic. In this PR I tackle that.

Note that this PR doesn't need to be in stack with #19443 but #19451 depends on both so putting this one into stack was the only way to unblock myself working on #19451.
AztecBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
As Martin mentioned [here](#19327 (comment)) makes sense to have the reorg handling be atomic. In this PR I tackle that.

Note that this PR doesn't need to be in stack with #19443 but #19451 depends on both so putting this one into stack was the only way to unblock myself working on #19451.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
As Martin mentioned
[here](#19327 (comment))
makes sense to have the reorg handling be atomic. In this PR I tackle
that.

Note that this PR doesn't need to be in stack with #19443 but #19451
depends on both so putting this one into stack was the only way to
unblock myself working on #19451.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants